To be charitable to most conservatives, I don't think Rush is the Be-All-and-End-All of the Right. I think the liberals just love to paint him as such, 'cause it makes the conservatives look silly... either falling over themselves trying to get away from Rush without offending those who still love him (see: Michael Steele; Phil Gingrey), or silly for agreeing with the big buffoon. And, of course, Rush's ego just loves the attention, so he won't deny being the Right's leading light, even if it does damage his movement for him to be so.
-- Steven Otte [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 8:02 PM Subject: [Media]Funniest Blog Leadline I've Ever Read > From talkingpointsmemo.com > > > Dems gloat after Rush awards himself sole custody of Steele's testicles. > > > OK, I know there are a few real conservatives on this list.? Can anyone of > you please explain to me exactly when Rush Limbaugh became the > be-all-end-all for the conservative conscience? > > And so it goes, > > Kevin Brabant (I mean, the guy's a buffoon....a real big buffoon) > [email protected] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "World News Now Discussion List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wnndl?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
