Burying him at sea denies the terrorists a martyrdom shrine. And doing so within 24 hours prevents Muslims from protesting that Islamic law was flouted. Cremation probably wouldn't be acceptable, and might be used as a recruitment tool. (Not that it won't be anyway, but it won't be as effective as the infidels desecrating the body would have been.)
-- Steven Otte [email protected] --- On Mon, 5/2/11, Glenda Collins <[email protected]> wrote: Why was he buried at sea? Why the fish fodder? Wouldn't burning to crumbs have sufficed? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "World News Now Discussion List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wnndl?hl=en.
