>Where? Is there another list??
Nope. As John said in his post things have been relatively quiet as the project is only going to start to pick-up steam now.
>I'm confused .. is Woden not one and the same as the "WSDL 2.0
>validating parser" you referred to above?
Yes and no. In the short term Woden will be a WSDL 2.0 validating parser. Woden's long term goal is to be a generic WSDL parser that will parse both WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0.
>Are commit messages going somewhere else? If not IIRC I haven't received
>any commit messages.
You're right. The commit messages are not coming though. The messages are being sent to a list woden-cvs which was never setup. Dims has volunteered to help out with this so I'll get this fixed with his help.
>I will also be around and will be happy to help build bridges as needed.
Great! Thanks Sanjiva.
Lawrence
| Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
06/13/2005 04:18 AM
|
|
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 01:33 -0400, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
>
> Hi Sanjiva,
>
> Development had already started on the WSDL 2.0 validating parser but
> the parser was not yet well developed. The parser was donated and
> development is now continuing at Apache with the Woden project.
Where? Is there another list??
> Woden is currently being developed using the public SVN repository. I
> agree that it doesn't make sense to develop in a closed or private
> setting and that is certainly not the intention of the few of us
> working on Woden. If it seems that way it's probably because so far
> John Kaputin has made the bulk of the code contribution.
I'm confused .. is Woden not one and the same as the "WSDL 2.0
validating parser" you referred to above?
Are commit messages going somewhere else? If not IIRC I haven't received
any commit messages.
> I'd also like to see more discussion on this list and also agree that
> input from interested groups (such as Axis, Eclipse, and the W3C) will
> be beneficial at this early stage of development.
I'd like to see *some* discussion on this list ;-). The only message in
May for example AFAICT was about the Web site! I don't recall a single
technical discussion ... did I just miss a bunch of mail?
> Arthur Ryman is acting as the W3C WSDL 2.0 working group
> representative and I am acting as the Eclipse WTP representative to
> this project. I know John has been in touch with someone from Axis but
> can you act as a representative for Axis and bring Axis related
> concerns to the attention of this list? If not, is there someone else
> you can recommend to fill this role?
Chathura Herath, who's doing the WOM stuff in Axis2, was listed as a
co-committer for Woden. However, AFAIK he hasn't had any contact with
the Woden team either.
I will also be around and will be happy to help build bridges as needed.
Sanjiva.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
