John,
I'm in favour in consolidating the implementation classes wherever it won't have a negative usability impact (such as when it requires odd or confusing method names).
As for the documentation you have, I'd encourage you to post what you have to the Wiki. We can refine it later but at least this will allow people to take a look at something.
Lawrence
| John Kaputin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11/03/2005 04:56 PM
|
|
I have just committed change r330632 so that now the Description and
DescriptionElement interfaces are implemented by a single class,
DescriptionImpl. Details of the design change, the rationale and a UML
class diagram are in the attached PDF. Comments welcome.
(See attached file: Design for WSDL Description.pdf)
BTW, I have various fragments of design in Word and UML that I still need
to collate into some design documentation on the website or wiki.
John Kaputin---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Design for WSDL Description.pdf
Description: Binary data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
