Andrez,

We will be focusing on getting the WSDL 2.0 through the Candidate
Recommendation stage first. After that we can address WSDL 1.1
compatibility.

-- Arthur

On 11/22/05, John Kaputin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have two objectives for supporting WSDL 1.1 in Woden:
>
> The first is to use Woden to read a WSDL 1.1. document and convert it into
> a WSDL 2.0 object model. A couple of people are looking into the conversion
> rules now, using XSL - those rules will be implemented in Woden in some
> form later on.
>
> The second objective is to support the WSDL 1.1 object model of the JSR110
> JWSDL API within Woden (i.e. the javax.wsdl.* interfaces implemented in
> WSDL4J such as Definition, Message, PortType, Binding, etc). So, you could
> use Woden to read a  WSDL 1.1 document and return a javax.wsdl.Definition
> object, rather than converting it into a WSDL 2.0 object model. This would
> be similar to use WSDL4J today, except you would be using the Woden's
> factory and reader classes instead of WSDL4J's.
>
> Our immediate focus is completing the WSDL 2.0 functionality - that is,
> reading a WSDL 2.0 document and returning it in a WSDL 2.0 object model.
> Our next milestone is M2 due December 2nd which should deliver parsing of
> <binding> and its child elements and extensions and the validation of the
> <types> and <interface> components (the parsing of these has already been
> completed). M3 due mid January should complete the WSDL 2.0 parsing and
> validation logic.
>
> We will then need to focus on the other objectives - supporting WSDL 2.0
> creation/editing/writing, supporting WSDL 1.1, etc.
>
> John Kaputin
>
>
>
>
>              "Andrzej
>              Taramina"
>              <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                          To
>              com>                      [email protected]
>                                                                         cc
>              22/11/2005 17:08
>                                                                    Subject
>                                        Compatibility plans?
>              Please respond to
>                  woden-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I'm curious as to how compatible Woden is intended to be from two
> perspectives?
>
> 1) With WSDL4J APIs
>
> 2) With regards to supporting WSDL 1.x definitions
>
> Appreciate any insight you can offer...
>
> Thanks.
>
> ....Andrzej
>
> Chaeron Corporation
> http://www.chaeron.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to