Arthur,
I included updates for component-assertion-table.xml, document-assertion-table.xml, and wsdl20.xml. These looked to be the source files to update for the assertion tables. Are there other files I should have updated?
Lawrence Mandel
| Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM
01/09/2006 12:15 PM |
|
Lawrence,
Thx. I'll review and apply the patch. You only need to include the patches for the source specs, e.g. wsdl20.xml, since the other files are generated.
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/06/2006 05:14 PM |
|
I've created and attached a patch for the WSDL20 folder that updates component-assertion-table.xml, document-assertion-table.xml, and wsdl20.xml to include assertions ids and entries in the assertion tables for sections 2.9-2.20, 4, 6, 7, and 8 of the WSDL 2.0 specification. I broke the assertions down as best I could into document and component assertions. When in doubt (there are some assertions that are really for service implementations) I marked them as component. It may be better to create a new type of assertion table for service implementations.
Thanks,
Lawrence Mandel
wsdl20.patch
Description: Binary data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
