Jim, Please feel free to contribute here. The WSDL4J source contributed by IBM is here [1].
We should have some discussion around the interfaces we provide for the WSDL 1.1 object model. The Woden proposal to the incubator [2] states that "Woden will not be an implementation of JSR110." So we could just rename the packages from javax.wsdl to org.apache.woden.wsdl11 (or should that be org.apache.woden.wsdl11.xml) which would give us one set of interfaces for manipulating WSDL 1.1 and another set for manipulating WSDL 2.0. An alternative is to abstract above both models - but really this is the objective of the WOM in Axis2. Thoughts? [1] http://cvs.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/wsdl4j_src.zip [2] http://incubator.apache.org/woden/proposal.html#Initial+Source Thx, Jeremy On 3/16/06, John Kaputin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim, > as Arthur mentions, WSDL 1.1 support in Woden is an ultimate objective of > the project. > > There are actually two objectives: > 1) converting a wsdl 1.1 document into the WSDL 2.0 component model. > 2) converting a wsdl 1.1 document into a WSDL 1.1 object model (e.g. the > Definition object implemented in wsdl4j) > > Option 1) will support applications that need a common wsdl model > regardless of the source document (1.1 or 2.0). > Option 2) will provide 'native' wsdl 1.1 support for applications that > currently require it, with a migration path to move to wsdl 2.0. > > The current focus on WSDL 2.0 compliance and the longer term plan for wsdl > 1.1 support in Woden is based on current priorities and available resource. > Our developer resource to date (2 developers) have only been able to focus > on the highest priority item, WSDL 2.0 functionality and for the time being > will continue to do so until the reference implementation is complete. If > Woden can attract more developers we may be able to expand our scope > sooner. Contributors can volunteer to work on particular items such as > WSDL 1.1 support if that is of interest to them. > > regards, > John Kaputin > > > > > Arthur Ryman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To > [email protected] > 16/03/2006 14:25 cc > [email protected] > Subject > Please respond to Re: Woden & WSDL 1.1 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > he.org > > > > > > > > > > Jim, > > The initial goal of Woden 1.0 is to help get the WSDL 2.0 specification out > of the CR stage and become a W3C Recommendation. We are therefore focusing > on the quality of the WSDL 2.0. We want to identify problems in the spec > before they become enshrined as part of the standard. So no, both WSDL 1.1 > and WS-I are out of scope for the initial release. However, it is a longer > term goal to have a single implementation that handles WSDL 1.1 too and > that is extensible so that other validation rules, like WS-I, can be > plug-in. > > If you need WSDL 1.1 and WS-I support, use WSDL4J at Apache and the WS-I > Tools Tools in WTP at Eclipse. > > Arthur Ryman, > IBM Software Group, Rational Division > > blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ > phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 > assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 > fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 > mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > "jim ma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To > 03/16/2006 01:13 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] > g > cc > Please respond to > [email protected] Subject > Woden & WSDL 1.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi , all > > Just tried woden and I have two qustions about it : > > [1] Will Woden1.0 support parsing and validating WSDL 1.1 documents ? > > [2] Does Woden intend to do the validation inculde ws-i basic profile > conformance ? > > Thanks > > Jim > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
