Just checked [3] below. It still refers to 'constraint attribute
information item ' instead of 'constraint element information item', as per
the text proposed in [2].
John Kaputin
"Jonathan Marsh"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com> To
John Kaputin/UK/[EMAIL PROTECTED],
16/03/2006 23:20 <[email protected]>
cc
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject
FW: Assertion required for property
<constraint>
Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this
issue as a CR007 [1]. The Working Group agreed to fix this per [2]. This
resolution is reflected in the latest draft [3].
Unless you let us know otherwise by 13 April, we will assume you agree with
the resolution of this issue.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR007
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Feb/0016.html
[3]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#references-definitions
[ Jonathan Marsh ][ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ][
http://spaces.msn.com/auburnmarshes ]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Kaputin (gmail)
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 12:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Assertion required for property <constraint>
See - Part 1, 3.1.3 References to Element Declarations and Type Definitions
The assertions include the following rule from this section about the
'element' attribute of <fault>, <input> and <output>:
Schema-0020. An element attribute information item MUST NOT refer to a
global xs:simpleType or xs:complexType definition.†
I think there's a similar assertion that needs to be captured in the next
paragraph:
A constraint attribute information item MUST NOT refer to a global
xs:element definition.
....although the text needs to be corrected to reflect that constraint is a
child element of <property>, not an attribute, and it's the QName within
<constraint> that must not refer to a global xs:element declaration.
regards,
John Kaputin
