WSDL 1.1 interop is NOT being tested at the event. Just WSDL 2.0 interop.

If you have a set of WSDL 1.1 documents, then you can use the converter to create WSDL 2.0 documents. The W3C needs to enlarge the test suite, so contribute these.

For WSDL 2.0 interop, start simple, e.g. EchoString, and then add complexity. We want to test as much of the spec as possible at the event.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/18/2006 08:27:02 AM:

> Seems like little bit confusion here.
>
> Chathura : I think we don't need to do the wsdl conversion thing as
> Arthur had suggested that method, in case our integration didn't happen.
> He has clearly mentioned later that, we don't need that.
>
> Ajith : Its better if we can do a complex scenario. But again as Arthur
> had mentioned, we just want to see whether WSDL 2.0 implementation
> (Woden) works nice with an existing web service implementation (Axis2).
> I think most of the interop scenarios works better with just Woden.
>
> Arthur, please correct me if I'm wrong. Thats what I understood from the
> test-suite and from your earlier comment.
>
> I will anyway, write a WSDL 2.0 document for a simple echo service and
> do the code gen and see.
>
> Do we need to do anything beyond that. Can some one please clarify?
>
> -- Chinthaka
>
>
> Chathura Herath wrote:
> > I am trying to use the interop WSDL(1.1) s and use WSDL convertor to
> > get 2.0WSDLs. It might give us some good services. I am now trying the
> > COmpound1
> > WSDL.
> > Chathura
> >
> > On 6/18/06, Ajith Ranabahu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> Sorry for the confusion. I was actually interested in a somewhat complex
> >> scenario for the WSDL interop . Perhaps one of the stockquote scenarios ?
> >>
> >> Ajith
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/17/06, Ajith Ranabahu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi Arthur,
> >> > We will be happy to provide you with some test cases with WSDL 2.0. In
> >> > any case do you have suggesions for the test services ?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Ajith
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 6/16/06, Arthur Ryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Eran,
> >> > >
> >> > > We can skip the WSDL 1.1 converter. That was a fallback in case Axis2
> >> > > integration was unavailable.
> >> > >
> >> > > The W3C needs help in defining the interop test suite. Can you
> >> assist?
> >> > > This can start very simply, e.g. create a few simple WSDL
> >> 2.0documents and then create the services and clients. Deploy the
> >> services on
> >> > > Axis2. The clients should at least take an endpoint as an argument
> >> so they
> >> > > can invoke the services implemented by others. The clients could
> >> be JUnits
> >> > > so when they run they report success or failure.
> >> > >
> >> > > To start, implement an EchoString service. You can then define more
> >> > > complex ones. You can contribute the WSDLs to W3C by emailing them
> >> to the
> >> > > WSDL 2.0 working group list. [1]. See [2] for more info about the
> >> test
> >> > > suite.
> >> > >
> >> > > [1] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > [2]
> >> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/index.html
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/index.html
> >
> >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Arthur Ryman,
> >> > > IBM Software Group, Rational Division
> >> > >
> >> > > blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
> >> > > phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
> >> > > assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
> >> > > fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
> >> > > mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >  *Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >*
> >> > >
> >> > > 06/16/2006 04:55 AM
> >> > >  Please respond to
> >> > > [email protected]
> >> > >
> >> > >   To
> >> > > [email protected]
> >> > >  cc
> >> > >
> >> > >  Subject
> >> > > Re: [axis2] woden/axis2 interop
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi Arthur and all,
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm bit confused of the way we gonna do this interop. I'd appreciate
> >> > > if
> >> > > some can explain the things we should do to test now.
> >> > >
> >> > > As I mentioned in one of my earlier emails, Axis2 can now understand
> >> > > WSDL 2.0 and send and receive messages through services deployed with
> >> > > WSDL 2.0. According to the first mail of this thread from Graham [1],
> >> > > its what we need to do. But later Arthur [2] had defined a different
> >> > > way
> >> > > with the use of wsdl 1.1 to 1.2 converter.
> >> > >
> >> > > I checked out the test suite from w3c and I'm ready to go.
> >> > >
> >> > > Please advice.
> >> > >
> >> > > -- Chinthaka
> >> > >
> >> > > [1] : http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=114960257910413&w=3
> >> > > [2] : http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=woden-dev&m=114960523016707&w=3
> >> > >
> >> > > Arthur Ryman wrote:
> >> > > > Eran,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'm glad to hear you're making such great progress. I'd prefer to
> >> > > not need
> >> > > > to use WSDL 1.1 for the tests.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Arthur Ryman,
> >> > > > IBM Software Group, Rational Division
> >> > > >
> >> > > > blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
> >> > > > phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
> >> > > > assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
> >> > > > fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
> >> > > > mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > > > 06/07/2006 06:32 AM
> >> > > > Please respond to
> >> > > > [email protected]
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > To
> >> > > > [email protected]
> >> > > > cc
> >> > > > [email protected]
> >> > > > Subject
> >> > > > Re: [axis2] woden/axis2 interop
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Sorry for the late reply.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > This is the progress so far from Axis2 side.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I started on populating AxisService from Woden. The code can be
> >> > > found in
> >> > > > WSDL20ToAxisServiceBuilder [1]. I was stuck with a problem there,
> >> > > but
> >> > > > will complete this asap. At the same time Deepal had completed
> >> > > ?wsdl2
> >> > > > generation.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > About the suggestion made by Arthur, I'm not that convinced to go
> >> > > > through WSDL 1.1 to support WSDL 2.0. Once we are done with
> >> > > > WSDL20ToAxisServiceBuilder, we don't need to do the mentioned hack,
> >> > > IMO.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > -- Chinthaka
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [1] :
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> http://svn.apache.
> org/viewvc/webservices/axis2/trunk/java/modules/core/src/org/apache/axis2/description/WSDL20ToAxisServiceBuilder.
> java?view=markup
> >>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Chathura Herath wrote:
> >> > > >> Hi,
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> So here is where we stand. Basic skeleton of the integration is
> >> > > >> there.I called it skeleton because it need to handle the rpc case
> >> > > and
> >> > > >> not so urgent but eventually need to handle the policy stuff. you
> >> > > can
> >> > > >> run WSDL2Jave with -wv 2 which will engage the woden. It will not
> >> > > >> codegen successfully, there is a schema compilation issue and have
> >> > > to
> >> > > >> fix it. I am concentrating on the xmlbeans databinding right now.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> The two Scenarios given above are the classic interop test and
> >> > > would
> >> > > >> be great to have. My guess is within two weeks we should be
> >> able to
> >> > > >> get the run time up and them we could see how the clients and
> >> > > servers
> >> > > >> generated with the isomorphic but two WSDL versions would interop.
> >> > > So
> >> > > >> i would say we will be able to have at least one interop scenario
> >> > > for
> >> > > >> the interop.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> John you could see the WSDL20ToAxisServiceBuilder which is the
> >> > > center
> >> > > >> of the integration work.
> >> > > >> Oshini please send your patches often and do have a look at the
> >> > > latest
> >> > > >> code. I should commit more often cos you are working on it as
> >> well.
> >> > > I
> >> > > >> have changed it to work with the component model, i belive you
> >> > > >> followed that thread.
> >> > > >> Thanks
> >> > > >> Chathura
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> On 6/6/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > >>> Oshani,
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> can you please open a JIRA issue and keep uploading diff's as you
> >> > > >>> progress?
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> thanks,
> >> > > >>> dims
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> On 6/6/06, Oshani Seneviratne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > >>>> Hi,
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> With the help of the core Axis2 dev team, I'm also in the
> >> process
> >> > > of
> >> > > >>>> implementing the Axis2/Woden integration. At the moment, my
> >> > > efforts
> >> > > >>> are on
> >> > > >>>> populating the AxisService once a WSDL2.0 is bundled in a
> >> service
> >> > > >>> archive
> >> > > >>>> file and deployed on Axis2.
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>> There's a class called WSDL20ToAxisServiceBuilder in Axis2. I
> >> > > > haven't
> >> > > >>>> looked at it yet, but is this the 'layer' between Woden and
> >> > > Axis2?
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> AFAIK, yes. And I am using this class to populate the
> >> AxisService
> >> > > >>> from the
> >> > > >>>> Woden components.
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> Hopefully I should be able to finish this by July 5th, so that
> >> > > the
> >> > > >>> scenarios
> >> > > >>>> mentioned earlier can be tested with Axis2.
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> Oshani
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> --
> >> > > >>> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Ajith Ranabahu
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ajith Ranabahu
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM]

Reply via email to