Sorry for missing this - I had a trip to Austin on short notice. I'm on vacation next week and on a course the following week.
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| "Oshani Seneviratne"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/15/2006 12:37 PM
|
|
Hi,
I regret that I couldn't attend the telecon today; I was away, and was
not in a position to be online during the time of the call.
As for my vacation plans, I really don't have any!
Hope to call in next week :).
Thanks and Regards,
Oshani
On 8/15/06, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Attendees: Lawrence Mandel, Graham Turrell
>
> Minutes
>
> 1. Open Action Items - Lawrence Mandel
>
> 2006-08-08 - Graham will follow up with Axis2 to find out a date for their
> next release.
> 2006-08-15
> Graham: I don't have a specific date yet. I'll post to the axis-dev list and
> ask and follow up on woden-dev.
>
> 2006-08-08 - Other Woden developers should update the team with their
> vacation plans for M6 to assist in M6 planning.
> Lawrence: I'm away Aug. 28-Sept. 20.
> John: I'm away Aug. 10-15, Aug. 28-30.
> Graham: I'm away Aug. 21-25.
> Jeremy: None.
> Arthur: I'm on vacation now, returning for the week of Aug. 14, then out
> again Aug. 21-25.
> Oshani?
>
> 2. M6 Status - Lawrence Mandel
>
> Lawrence: Graham, have you made any progress with the URI resolver?
> Graham: I've got a framework in place with a simple URI resolver using a
> properties file. There are a few issues such as hard coded XSDs in Woden but
> this is mostly working. I'm also working on a resolver for the OASIS catalog
> standard to be optionally used. This will require resolver.jar from xml
> commons.
> Lawrence: Great progress. As a reminder, in Eclipse we will plug in our own
> URI resolution framework that supports chaining resolvers and dynamic
> binding of new resolvers. Multiple resolvers, chaining, etc. all should be
> out of scope for Woden. Woden should simply support the addition of a single
> URI resolver that clients can use to do more advanced resolution.
> Graham: In order to contribute a resolver a resolver factory needs to be
> created and made available anywhere on the classpath. I'll look for feedback
> on this mechanism, which I chose for consistency with existing Woden
> structure, once I contribute the patch. I'm going to try to get something
> out by the end of this week but only if I can get it in a state that it can
> be used.
> Lawrence: You may have identified a Woden configuration issue. Woden should
> follow the examples set by other parsers and allow multiple parser instances
> to be configured in different ways in the same VM. As you said, we'll take a
> further look at this once you make a patch available.
>
> 3.Development Discussion - All
>
> There was no other development discussion.
>
> 4. Other Business - Open
>
> There was no other business.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lawrence Mandel
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
