I've just found the maven2 stuff will help out with this :-) after doing a mvn site the target/site/dependencies.html will give a tree of the dependencies.
Jeremy On 9/18/06, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be nice to say to our users: these are the min and max levels we've tested with. Then they can use anything between that range. But then there's the possibility that one prereq requires a different level of one of its prereqs. This is where the release manager adds value. For now I can't think of where this might occur, it would certainly limit what we could claim support for. Jeremy On 9/18/06, Graham Turrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My only concern would be one of support. Whilst fine for the moment, if we > remain at a fixed level forever, > we might find an upgrade forced upon us should we hit a bug in 2.8.1 some > time in the future. > > Having said that we are now running with a proven Xerces-J version which > meets our needs. > Is 2.8.1 a pure maintenance release or does it introduce new features > and/or dependencies? > > In general, I'd prefer to only upgrade jars when the need arises. > > My 2c. > > Kind Regards, > > Graham. > _____________________________________________ > Graham C Turrell CEng, MBCS > Chartered IT Practitioner > > WebSphere ESB Foundation Technologies > DE3F16 / MP 211 > IBM Labs > Hursley Park > Winchester, Hampshire > England. SO21 2JN > > Tel +44-(0)1962-815018 > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "No army can withstand the force of an idea whose time > has come.". -Victor Hugo > > > > "Jeremy Hughes" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > rg> To > Sent by: [email protected] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc > om > Subject > Xerces-J 2.8.1 > 15/09/2006 20:05 > > > Please respond to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > he.org > > > > > > > Hi, Xerces-J just released 2.8.1. Our ant build is set to require > 2.8.0. It's easy enough to move up to 2.8.1 but should we? Should we > be moving up to the latest and greatest Xerces when an older one would > be sufficient. We don't require the latest JRE. > > I'd be +1 to using the oldest Xerces that we can use and still pass > our unit tests. This then puts a lesser requirement on our users. > > What do you all think? > > Jeremy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
