Interestingly Robert's cited LICENSE file [1] includes all the
different licenses that cover all the different files in the
distribution. Whereas we have multiple LICENSE* files. Our NOTICE file
...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /cygdrive/c/workspaces/e31
Apache Woden (incubating)
Copyright 2005, 2006 The Apache Software Foundation
This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
This product includes also software developed by :
- the W3C consortium (http://www.w3c.org) ,
- the SAX project (http://www.saxproject.org)
Please read the different LICENSE files present in the root directory of
this distribution.
already includes mention of W3C.
So I think we already have this covered by having the W3C license
being included in our distribution. To clean things up though I'm +1
to merging our LICENSE* files into one just like Robert's sample.
Cheers,
Jeremy
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/examples/LICENSE
On 11/5/06, Graham Turrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi List,
Some feedback on the legalities of distributing W3C content with Woden
(scroll to end for Robert's comments)
er
WebSphere ESB Foundation Technologies
DE3F16 / MP 211
IBM Labs
Hursley Park
Winchester, Hampshire
England. SO21 2JN
Tel +44-(0)1962-815018
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"No army can withstand the force of an idea whose time
has come.". -Victor Hugo
----- Forwarded by Graham Turrell/UK/IBM on 05/11/2006 19:37 -----
Graham
Turrell/UK/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MGB To
[email protected]
05/11/2006 18:50 cc
Subject
Please respond to Re: publishing standard XML Schema
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as part of Woden deliverable
.apache.org
Hi Robert,
Many thanks for this!
(I've clearly found both quantity and quality ;))
Kind Regards,
Graham.
_____________________________________________
Graham C Turrell CEng, MBCS
Chartered IT Practitioner
WebSphere ESB Foundation Technologies
DE3F16 / MP 211
IBM Labs
Hursley Park
Winchester, Hampshire
England. SO21 2JN
Tel +44-(0)1962-815018
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"No army can withstand the force of an idea whose time
has come.". -Victor Hugo
"robert burrell
donkin"
<robertburrelldon To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [email protected]
cc
05/11/2006 11:01
Subject
Re: publishing standard XML Schema
Please respond to as part of Woden deliverable
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.apache.org
On 10/31/06, Graham Turrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I originally posted this question to legal-discuss, but thought it would
> be good to widen the circulation to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get the benefit
of
> your experience also. All comments/thoughts welcome !
substituting quantity for quality :-)
> I work on the Woden incubator project and have been asked to investigate
> what (legal and/or procedural) issues there might be in including the
> standard WSDL2 schema and XML schema as part of the Woden deliverable.
This
> is in connection with the provision of a URI Resolver in Woden, one use
of
> which is to redirect Schema access to locally stored versions, thus
> allowing offline parsing.
>
> Also, we have a testcase that uses local schema copies (even though the
> woden deliverable itself currently does not contain them). The testcases
> are stored on apache svn server and we need to add this new testcase to
> them. Are there any issues with doing so? I would stress that they that
> they are *not* part of the deliverable.
>
> I include the copyright statements for the files in question:
>
> wsdl20.xsd (wsdl20-extensions.xsd, wsdl20-rpc.xsd and wsdl20-soap.xsd all
> use the same copyright notice).:
>
> <!--> W3C XML Schema defined in the Web Services Description (WSDL)
> Version 2.0 specification
> http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20
>
> Copyright (c) 2005 World Wide Web Consortium,
>
> (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, European Research Consortium
for
> Informatics and Mathematics, Keio University). All Rights Reserved.
This
> work is distributed under the W3C (c) Software License [1] in the hope
> that
> it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied
> warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
>
> [1]
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231
>
> $Id: wsdl20.xsd,v 1.11 2006/05/08 23:52:18 aryman Exp $
> -->
AIUI http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231
(W3C SOFTWARE NOTICE AND LICENSE) is fine (non-reciprical open
source). there's no problem distributing it as part of an apache
release.
note that the NOTICE and LICENSE files would need to be updated with
the notice required by W3C and the license for the files indicated in
the LICENSE (for example
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/examples/LICENSE) respectively.
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
