Jeremy,

I see several CCLA's. Each one has a qualifier like harmony, Geronimo
etc. I don't see one that covers woden/wsdl4j. Please send an email to
jim AT apache.org if you need a "formal" answer. (Jim is the Secretary
of Apache).

thanks,
dims

On 3/9/07, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dims, thanks for looking. I guess I'm not clear on something. My
understanding was that a software grant form is for a specific
donation of pre-existing code. A CCLA is a one-per-corporation thing.
You seem to be implying that a CCLA is a one-per-donation thing just
like a software grant. In which case, why the two forms?

Thanks,
Jeremy

On 09/03/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> Nope. Don't see a CCLA for woden/wsdl4j.
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 3/9/07, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Dims, I believe IBM has a CCLA, does this cover us? I don't have
> > access to the cclas.txt - could you check whether it covers us?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jeremy
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 08-Mar-2007 16:21
> > Subject: Re: wsdl4j license inconsistency
> > To: [email protected]
> >
> >
> > John,
> >
> > There is no record of a receipt of a Software Grant by ASF. So you
> > should at least upload the zip to JIRA and click on the button for
> > granting Apache license for that zip.
> >
> > If you could parellely send a fax for the Software Grant. that would
> > be the best solution.
> > http://www.apache.org/licenses/
> >
> > thanks,
> > dims
> >
> > On 3/8/07, John Kaputin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Paul,
> > > the initial code contribution that IBM made to the Woden incubator project
> > > was for WSDL4J 1.4, to provide a code base for developing a similar WSDL
> > > processor to support WSDL 2.0.   As you may recall, you obtained the
> > > approval to contribute WSDL4J 1.4 when you were still with IBM.
> > >
> > > IBM has not had any plan to discontinue the WSDL4J project at
> > > Sourceforge.net.  The Sourceforge WSDL4J project is still required to
> > > support WSDL 1.1 processing and to provide IBM's reference implementation
> > > for JSR110, and IBM continues to make new releases of WSDL4J available
> > > under the CPL v1.0.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > John Kaputin
> > >
> > >
> > > "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/03/2007 15:36:02:
> > >
> > > > Jeremy
> > > >
> > > > I agree that is the correct long term plan! But I also thought there
> > > > was a plan (as evidenced by checking in the 1.4 code) to move WSDL4J
> > > > over as-is and work on the 1.x and 2.x code both in Apache? It seems
> > > > like it might be a good idea?
> > > >
> > > > Paul
> > > >
> > > > On 3/8/07, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On 08/03/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Jukka,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There may be a way out...check the JIRA :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe it hasn't been clear (sorry) ... the code in the JIRA is a
> > > > > snapshot of WSDL4J 1.4. Axis2 uses WSDL4J 1.6.2 which isn't
> > > > > contributed. So, the revisions to WSDL4J since 1.4 haven't been
> > > > > contributed.
> > > > >
> > > > > The way forward on this IMO, is for Axis2 to move to use Woden and not
> > > > > WSDL4J. Woden doesn't yet support WSDL 1.1, but it does have an
> > > > > intention to (although it doesn't have the intention of being a JSR
> > > > > 110 implementation).
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Jeremy
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Paul Fremantle
> > > > VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> > > >
> > > > http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> > > 741598.
> > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to