Hi Lawrence, Today I tried to join for Woden Status Telecon through IRC as you described in [1] at 9.00 AM EST . I used IRC client called "xchat", I connected to the #apache-woden Channel on freenode.org server successfully, but I couldn't see any of you or any on-going discussion there, any problem with my procedure ...?
[1] http://ws.apache.org/woden/dev/index.html#Weekly+Status+Call Thanks , On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attendees: Lawrence Mandel, John Kaputin > > Minutes > > 1. Open Action Items - Lawrence Mandel > > > 2008-04-29 - John will update the build publish information to include > information about publishing Maven components. > 2008-05-13 > John: No update. > Lawrence: The location for the maven repo is > /www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository and the > distribution directory is /www/www.apache.org/dist/ws/woden, both on > people.apache.org. > 2008-06-03 > John: No progress. > 2008-06-24 > John: No progress. I've been catching up with Woden issues. > > > 2008-05-13 - John will close the M8 plan and create the M9 plan with July > 15 as the target date. > 2008-06-03 > John: No progress. > Lawrence: I closed M8 in Jira and rolled all the incomplete items into M9. > 2008-06-24 > John: No progress. I'll get on this now that I have my access back. > > > 2. Milestone 9 (M9) - John/Lawrence > > John: No progress on M9 yet. > Lawrence: Ditto. > > John: We originally talked about July for M9 but I don't know that we'll > be able to get the work done by then. > > > 3. Development Discussion - All > > John: There's been some activity on the mailing list. We need to keep on > top of it. > > John: Jeff has suggested refactoring the Woden repository. I don't think > we need to include java twice in the hierarchy but other wise I think his > suggestion is good. One issue is there are some base classes that do not > belong in OM or DOM. Should we create another jar or role it into one of > the implementations? > Lawrence: I think it would be best to keep common code out of the > implementation modules. However I don't think we need an extra jar for > this common code. > John: We can just include the common code in each of the implementations. > We will need to see how this works with the Maven build. > Lawrence: Should we change the Ant build to be based off Maven? Ant can > simply call off to Maven for the build. > John: For now we should keep the Ant build in place. > Lawrence: Agreed. > > John: There was a discussion about the user of equals in Woden. Arthur > suggested adding a new method. Jeremy suggested some use cases all on the > component model. > Lawrence: Let's keep this discussion going in WODEN-211 [1]. > > John: Jeremy also brought up the two API vs one API issue again. I'll > bring this discussion up again once we have time. > > Lawrence: Saminda raised an issue with Woden OSGi bundle. WODEN-210 [2] > was opened for this. I'll follow up with Saminda. > > John: I need to follow up with Vikas about OM. I'll follow up this week. > > [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-211 > [2]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-210 > > 4. Other Business - All > > No other business raised. > > > Thanks, > > Lawrence Mandel > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Sagara Gunathunga Blog - ssagara.blogspot.com Web - http://sagaras.awardspace.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
