Hi Dilshan,
I think it's most important to make some concrete process. Go with either
naming option. You can always refactor after receiving feedback on your
implementation.
Lawrence
From:
Dilshan Edirisuriya <dilshan...@gmail.com>
To:
woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Date:
06/09/2010 07:37 AM
Subject:
[proposal] name prefix for new read/write interfaces
Hi,
Thanks you for the comments given to [1] , I am ready to submit my first
patch that contains set of new read/write interfaces . Still I have some
doubts about the naming conventions according to our discussion on JIRA
issue. We discussed that "Editable" prefix is too long and by make using
the same name as read-only components may lead to confusion. So best
approach is to use a short prefix according to my knowledge. Following are
my suggestions.
1.) Use "Ed" instead of "Editable"
e.g - EdBinding , EdDescription
2.) Use "E"
e.g - EBinding , EDescription
Please provide your feedback on above. Any other alternative ideas are
welcome.
[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-20
Thank You,
Regards,
Dilshan
