That is a potential representation for the concept. I believe that its
advocates would argue that repeating the payload in each message is redundant
and not space-efficient, but I'm not personally taking a position on this use
case either way.
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Dick Hardt [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 2:29 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: Joe Hildebrand; Paul Hoffman; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [woes] Preparation for the WOES meeting
On 2011-03-22, at 2:19 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
> The use case for this comes from the OpenID Contract Exchange specification,
> where they want multiple parties to have signed the same plaintext in no
> particular order. This occurs in real life, for instance, when both parties
> have to sign the same business or real estate contract.
Why not solve this infrequent use case with multiple identical messages signed
separately?
_______________________________________________
woes mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
