+2 for JOES +1 for JOSE On 2011-07-27, at 12:30 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
> +1 to either JOSE or JOES > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John > Bradley > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 12:02 PM > To: Peter Saint-Andre > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [woes] naming > > Woes makes me think of a Muddy Waters song. > > Javascript Object Signing and Encrypting (JOSE) > > Works for us South Americans. Though I will insist on pronouncing it > correctly. > > John B. > On 2011-07-27, at 2:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > > Encryption and Signing for JavaScript Applications = ESJA? > > Pronounced "essjay" (Wikipedia users might get the joke)... > > _______________________________________________ > woes mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes > > _______________________________________________ > woes mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
_______________________________________________ woes mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
