[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WOOKIE-133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernhard Hoisl updated WOOKIE-133:
----------------------------------
Attachment: coupling-widgets-patch.txt
I have created a patch out of my developments for IWC to be able to specify
coupling widgets in widgetserver.properties. There, you can enter any
combination of attributes which are used to find coupling widget instances. If
widget.iwc.coupling is commented out (default), nothing changes to the notify
behavior of Wookie.
Actually, it would be possible to simplify the code, because as default we
could state
widget.iwc.coupling = apiKey, sharedDataKey, idKey
which is the exact same behavior as Wookie acts now. But as to do not interfere
with existing developments I made an if-else switch, as that my code comes only
in place if a user explicitly uncomments widget.iwc.coupling.
Inter-widget communication as used by myself was not intended at the time
designing shared data update behavior for Wookie. Therefore, it does not fit as
nicely as it could, but for the time being I think it is sufficient. When more
sophisticated approaches emerge a re-factoring of setting shared data,
receiving updates and notifications should be envisioned.
> Implement inter-widget messaging
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: WOOKIE-133
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WOOKIE-133
> Project: Wookie
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Server, Wookie REST API
> Reporter: Scott Wilson
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.9.1
>
> Attachments: coupling-widgets-patch.txt
>
> Original Estimate: 168h
> Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> One of the more persistent new feature requests we've had for Wookie has been
> to extend the mechanisms for inter-widget communication (IWC). As it
> currently stands, Wookie supports two mechanisms for IWC:
> 1. Wave Shared States
> Wookie enables "sibling" widgets to share their state. This is exposed to
> widgets using the Google Wave Gadget API, which enables widgets to submit
> state update deltas, and to register a callback to notify them when their
> state has been updated by another widget instance. We define siblings using
> the algorithm in org.apache.wookie.util.SiblingPageNormalizer; essentially
> this is that the widget instance must be for the same widget, with the same
> shared data key, and the same API key.
> 2. HTML5 Drag and Drop
> While not actually part of Wookie itself, Widgets can be developed using
> HTML5 drag and drop capability, enabling user-directed IWC.
> Some use-cases for IWC have been collected on the Talk About Widgets mailing
> list.
> The most common use-cases for extending IWC proposed for Wookie I've seen
> involve "Dashboard"-style messaging. In this model, widgets appearing in the
> same space for the user get to share events. For example, all the widgets in
> a single user's dashboard can send data to each other. This might follow a
> single shared state model, but is more likely to follow a "channel" metaphor,
> with named "channels" or "queues" between widgets. There are several ways
> this could be implemented, for example:
> A. User-specified channels
> In this model, the user specifies exactly which messages are sent between
> widgets. For example, the EzWeb project defines a "wiring" interface with
> "slots" and "events" connected with user-created "channels". For example, the
> user create a channel from a widget with a "weather" event to a widget with a
> "weather" slot.
> B. Widget-specified channels
> In this model, widgets are automatically able to receive any events on any
> channel that they choose to listen to. Users do not need to create channels
> to enable IWC.
> These two mechanisms are not necessarily exclusive, and could be supported
> within the same Feature extension. For example, the JavaScript API may look
> like this:
> iwc.sendEvent(String event_name, Object event_value)
> iwc.registerCallback(String slot_name, Function callback)
> I would prefer having this IWC extension use its own functions in its own
> object rather than overload the Wave and Widget objects, to avoid any
> possible confusion.
> In case "A", callbacks are only triggered where there are explicit channels
> linking the sending event and the receiving slot; in case "B", events are
> propagated to all registered callbacks that the event_name matches.
> For example, in pseudocode, the implementation could look something like:
> sendEvent(event_name, value, idkey){
> instance = find widget instance (idkey)
> if use_channels:
> event = find event(instance.getWidget, event_name)
> find channels (eventinstance = instance & event =
> event_name)
> for channel in channels:
> slot = channel.slot
> send notification to slot (target, slot, value)
>
> Notifier.notifySingleInstance(target,"iwc.__callback({slot},{value})")
> else:
>
> Notifier.notifySiblingsByUser(instance,"iwc.__callback({event_name},{value})")
> }
> Note that in case "A", the widget author just registers callbacks for its
> slots without having to be concerned with what the sending widget calls them,
> so if a user can wire a "weather" event to a "temperature" slot, the sending
> widget calls:
> sendEvent("weather","30C");
> and the receiver can call:
> registerCallback("temperature",my_function);
> ... and the channel wires things up despite the names not matching. In case
> B, the receiving widget would have to know the name of the event, and
> register a callback.
> In case A, widgets need to declare their "events" and "slots" as extensions
> in config.xml so they can be wired up in channels by a user, and there needs
> to be some sort of UI where users get to do some wiring. Wookie could expose
> an API for creating/removing/editing channels that could be implemented by
> containers rather than provide this UI itself.
> (Interestingly, case A would in theory support situations where widgets send
> notifications to widgets in different containers; though I think this would
> only really work if we went did the OpenID implementation so could have some
> assurance that the source and target widget instances belonged to the same
> user).
> [1] http://groups.google.com/group/talk-about-widgets/web/use-cases-for-iwc
> [2] http://forge.morfeo-project.org/wiki/index.php/Gadget_development_guide
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
