On 18/10/2010 14:12, Bernhard Hoisl wrote:
Committership is earned through participation. The barrier is not high,
I'd say your open engagement with the community so far is an excellent
start, however, we do need to see a few patches via the issue tracker
first.
There's also some legal and infrastructural to go through before someone
can have commit access so even if we were to vote you in as a committer
it would take a little time.
Please provide a patch via https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WOOKIE
Please remember smaller incremental patches are much easier to review
and thus get processed more quickly.
(if you need any help creating the patches let us know)
OK, I didn't know that committing is undergoing such a formal process. I
just thought in terms of simplicity and speed :-)
The barriers are low, but not quite that low ;-)
So, I have provided a patch and put it on the issue tracker (I hope I
did it the right way, otherwise just correct me please).
That's fantastic. Thank you. I've given it a cursory glance and it looks
fine by me. However, we really need Scott or Kris to review this as I
don't know the background to this work.
I'd like to see tests accompanying all new methods, but the project does
not yet have a policy on this.
BTW: For our project LTfLL (www.ltfll-project.org) I designed a
widget-template which includes libraries for easy handling of shared
data and for receiving updates - especially targeted for using IWC with
Wookie and the coupling widget features provided as the patch.
Can you templates be sensibly added to/compliment of our existing widget
templates? See http://incubator.apache.org/wookie/building-widgets.html
If this code is already publicly viewable let me know, I'll have a look
at it to see if it is a natural complement. This part of the code I can
review.
Ross
