I'm verifying wookie-198 - I have had rather too much red wine to be doing this, but I promised Scott and he bought me a beer so I'm trying...
Problem is I still can't find any reference to some of the jars identified in wookie-198 There are also a whole bunch of jars mentioned in runtime_licence that are not included in the distribution (e.g. lucene-core) It's actually very difficult to review this as there is minimal correlation between the licence and the jar in question. I think we need to use a clearer licence model. We should consider creating a license folder and within that put all the license files that we need, named in such a way that it is easy to look trough ivy.xml and the widget lib folders and cross check. licence/activation_license.txt licence/jetty_license.txt This will make it much simpler to check (regardless of how much red wine has been consumed). Ross On 18 June 2011 01:03, Ross Gardler <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, > > I'm really unbelievably busy right now. However, we are at an event > together next week working on Wookie. I'll be in the late night > hacking room with a beer. Come find me and make me do it then (if not > already done). > > Ross > > On 16 June 2011 17:33, Scott Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: >> [Bump!] >> >> Can someone check the license files etc in the RC2 distros and (hopefully) >> close these remaining issues? >> >> WOOKIE-195 >> Source and Binary distribution need a few more disclaimers and notices >> >> WOOKIE-198 >> Standalone binary distribution does not mention 3rd party license library >> licenses >> >> WOOKIE-200 >> Source distribution is missing MIT license for JQuery >> >> S >> >> On 1 Jun 2011, at 19:14, Scott Wilson wrote: >> >>> I think this may have got "buried" when there were a lot of 0.9.1 commits >>> going in. >>> >>> I've tried them all out now and had no problems other than having to "chmod >>> +x startup.sh" on the standalone version. Can everyone else give them a try >>> so we can finish the release? >>> >>> S >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> From: Paul Sharples <[email protected]> >>>> Date: 20 May 2011 16:33:04 GMT+01:00 >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: New build/s for wookie - new request for testing (RC2) >>>> Reply-To: [email protected] >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I've uploaded some new builds for the 0.9.0 branch (and called them RC2). >>>> FYI: The standalone and war builds contained quite a few more libraries >>>> than the source build, so I had to track them down and so have now put >>>> those specific ones in the RUNTIME_LICENSE file, found at the root of the >>>> standalone and war distros. If the licence files are now in order, I will >>>> close the remaining JIRA issues against it. >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~psharples/wookie/staging-area/0p9p0/rc2/ >>>> >>>> Hopefully we are there now. >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> P.S - We *should* have all the license issues sorted out now (however, >>>> we're still waiting on the [email protected] list for a reply about >>>> one particular license - >>>> http://www.extreme.indiana.edu/viewcvs/~checkout~/XPP3/java/LICENSE.txt), >>>> but we think it is okay. >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Ross Gardler <[email protected]> > Programme Leader (Open Development) > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com > -- Ross Gardler <[email protected]> Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
