On 04/11/2011 16:12, Ross Gardler wrote:
I'm afraid the vote is not successful, we need another binding IPMC
vote (minimum of 3 +1s).

I meant our wookie-dev vote is successful. I knew we also had to punt it to general, as we did last time & i have already done so.

Paul


We should get this once you forward this vote to the IPMC.

(Ate and I will track it over there and nudge people)

Ross


On 4 November 2011 15:17, Paul Sharples<[email protected]>  wrote:
The vote has closed with the following results:

IPMC Members/Mentors:

+1 [2]
  0 [0]
-1 [0]

PPMC Members:

+1 [3]
  0 [0]
-1 [0]

The vote is ****successful****

Voting Record:

Scott Wilson: +1
Kris Popat: +1
Raido Kuli: +1
**Ross Gardler: +1
**Ate Douma: +1

(**Denotes a Wookie Mentor)

Note: The original vote was kept open longer than the original 72 hours to
allow everyone to participate.

  ==========================================================================

This is the second incubator release for Apache Wookie, with the artifacts
being versioned as 0.9.1-incubating.

(Note: this build is different to 0.9.1-RC3 in that the source distributions
have been rebuilt, while all other artifacts are the same)

We are requesting a vote via wookie-dev for the release of the artifacts in
the first instance found here...

http://people.apache.org/~psharples/wookie/staging-area/0p9p1/rc4/

...as the final 0.9.1-incubating release.

PGP release keys (signed using DDED352A):

http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/wookie/KEYS

Additionally with version 0.9.1-incubating we are releasing 3 sets of maven
artifacts, which we hope will help
others to integrate WOOKIE into their own applications. These are...

1. Wookie itself as a downloadable WAR
2. The W3C parser
3. The Java connector framework

These artifacts are now in the staging area found here...

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewookie-125/

Please take the time to verify the artifacts before casting your vote.

Vote will be open for 72 hours. (but probably longer)

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)





Reply via email to