On 5/19/12 2:10 PM, "Scott Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 19 May 2012, at 16:17, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>
>> Moving this to a discuss thread.  Sorry for polluting the VOTE thread.
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 10:54 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Wookie 0.10.0-incubating Release Candidate
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 9:59 AM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Wookie 0.10.0-incubating Release Candidate
>>>> 
>>>> I will review this today.  One suggestion, we probably should not use
>>>>the
>>> same
>>>> version string for a canceled vote.  Maybe call it 0.10.1 or
>>>>something else to
>>>> ensure that there is no confusion.
>>> 
>>> Got a little behind; but, in reviewing the release yesterday I was
>>>unable to
>>> build the tag or the source tarball.  Since I can't build 0.9.2 or
>>>trunk, I assume
>>> this is something in my environment; but I want to be sure.  I am
>>>getting the
>>> error from ivy:
>>> 
>>> [ivy:resolve]               ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
>>> [ivy:resolve]               ::          UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES         ::
>>> [ivy:resolve]               ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
>>> [ivy:resolve]               :: commons-logging#commons-logging;1.1.1:
>>> configuration not found in commons-logging#commons-logging;1.1.1:
>>> 'compile'. It was required from org.apache.wookie#wookie-parser;0.10.0-
>>> incubating-SNAPSHOT runtime
>>> [ivy:resolve]               ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
>>> 
>>> Anyone seen this before?
>
>I think commons-logging 1.1.1 may not have been synched with maven
>central as a search there doesn't turn anything up - its in repo1 however:
>
>http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-logging/commons-logging/1.1.1/common
>s-logging-1.1.1.pom

I am new to ivy, but with Maven, as you know, you can point to a different
repo in the POM.  Is there a comparable mechanism for Ivy?  Also, commons
logging 1.1.1 is in my local maven repository cache.  Wouldn't ivy just
use that?

Is anyone else having this issue? I will try it on a different machine to
be sure this isn't just with my machine.

>
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Scott Wilson [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 7:05 AM
>>>>> To: wookie-dev
>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Wookie 0.10.0-incubating Release Candidate
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is the third incubator release for Apache Wookie, with the
>>>>>artifacts
>>> being
>>>>> versioned as 0.10.0-incubating.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We are requesting a vote via wookie-dev for the release of the
>>>>>artifacts in
>>>> the
>>>>> first instance found here...
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/wookie/0.10.0-incubating/
>>>>> 
>>>>> ...as the final 0.10.0-incubating release.
>>>>> 
>>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 6F30516D):
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/wookie/KEYS
>>>>> 
>>>>> Additionally there are 3 sets of maven artifacts, which we hope will
>>>>>help
>>>>> others to integrate WOOKIE into their own applications. These are...
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1. Wookie itself as a downloadable WAR
>>>>> 2. The W3C parser
>>>>> 3. The Java connector framework
>>>>> 
>>>>> These artifacts are now in the staging area found here...
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewookie-
>>> 094/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please take the time to verify the artifacts before casting your
>>>>>vote.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Vote will be open at least 72 hours but until we receive most of the
>>>>> committers votes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>

Reply via email to