On 15/06/2012 10:17, Scott Wilson wrote:
  Content preview:  On 14 Jun 2012, at 16:44, Ross Gardler wrote:>  start both
     - no need for one to delay the other (except peoples time of course). I've
     made a start on the graduation tasks - who wants to be release manager this
     time? [...]

  Content analysis details:   (-10.1 points, 5.0 required)

   pts rule name              description
  ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI       RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high
                              trust
                              [140.211.11.3 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail 
provider
                              (scott.bradley.wilson[at]gmail.com)
  -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD      Envelope sender domain matches handover relay

                              domain
  -3.0 RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED   RBL: Sender is in Return Path Certified (trusted
                               relay)
                              [Return Path SenderScore Certified (formerly]
                        [Bonded Sender) -<http://www.senderscorecertified.com>]
  -2.0 RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE        RBL: Sender is in Return Path Safe (trusted relay)
                              [Return Path SenderScore Safe List (formerly]
                      [Habeas Safelist) -<http://www.senderscorecertified.com>]
  -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from 
author's
                              domain
   0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not 
necessarily valid
  -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK 
signature
Return-Path: wookie-dev-return-4832-P.Sharples=bolton.ac...@incubator.apache.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2012 09:18:01.0570 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[C3202420:01CD4AD7]

On 14 Jun 2012, at 16:44, Ross Gardler wrote:

start both - no need for one to delay the other (except peoples time of course).
I've made a start on the graduation tasks - who wants to be release manager 
this time?

I'll make a start on this shortly.

Paul


On 14 June 2012 15:59, Scott Wilson<[email protected]>  wrote:
Hi everyone,

I'm just conscious that its the 15th tomorrow, which would normally be our 
Start The Release Process Day. However, we also in our last report indicated we 
would start the process of requesting graduation after we released 0.10.0, 
which we did last month.

So... should we start a new release, or postpone it and start working on our 
graduation proposal?

S


--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2180 / Virus Database: 2433/5065 - Release Date: 06/12/12




Reply via email to