On 9 Jul 2012, at 08:50, Olexiy Chudnovskyy wrote: > Hi Ross, > >> >> I suspect the best way to proceed is to start out extracting your code > into the >> stand-alone project we've discussed. It would be best to do that in stages >> contributing patches directly to Wookie as you go. This will enable us to >> evaluate individual contributors patches and recognise individual merit as >> appropriate. It will make things a little slower to start with as you will > need >> someone here to submit your patches to version control. However, since >> nobody here is likely to work on it in the short term this shouldn't pose > much >> of a problem. >> The advantage is that we would be able to give commit rights in > recognition >> of the work being done during the porting. >> > > I think this is the best option. As soon as we have IWC-Enchancer extracted > out of Wookie I will come back to you. > > One other question - do you know if and where we can find some real-life W3C > widgets to experiment with? Are there any widget repositories existing on > the Web or being developed in other projects (beside OMELETTE)?
Opera have some: http://widgets.opera.com/ .. though not all are W3C-compliant A lot of the other widgets around seem to be locked into mobile operator/handset vendor app stores e.g. Vodafone, Samsung rather than publicly downloadable via the browser > > Best Regards, > Olexiy >
