Later today or maybe tomorrow, if I cannot today, I will post my last information, current value of macromagnitudes, and prediction about these two economies. I hope all this information is useful.
:) Peace and best wishes. Xi On Mar 27, 1:18 pm, "Sumerian.." <sumerian...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Thanks for explaining. > > ======= > S1000+ > ======= > > --- On Thu, 3/26/09, xi <xieu.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: xi <xieu.l...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: For Sumerian (and anyone interested) on Malaysia, Australia and > the global economy. Message 2/3 > To: "World-thread" <world-thread@googlegroups.com> > Date: Thursday, March 26, 2009, 12:38 PM > > <<you probably can see easily that economic ties between > Australia and China are harder and harder ( do you mean stronger and > stronger?>> > > Yes, sorry, I meant stronger and stronger. > > <<gradually that trend will be > stronger although conflicts might appear to delay those trends. >> > > I meant, that both, Malaysia and Australia, are changing and they both > have to change much more within the next years and decades. Cultural, > ethnic conflicts are present in both countries. That sort of conflicts > become harder in transition periods like this one. I cannot predict > (it is politics and I do not know about it) how those conflicts can be > handled in each of those countries. To try to prevent the natural flow > of events creates conflicts and delays the future, and mismanagement > of such conflicts can delay it even longer and make it uncomfortable > for most people. > > Peace and best wishes. > > Xi > > On Mar 26, 10:57 am, "Sumerian.." <sumerian...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi. > > very important message indeed.. > > > But what did you mean by this > > > For example, you probably can see easily that economic ties between > > Australia and China are harder and harder ( do you mean stronger and > > stronger? S1000+ PS: harder in here means difficult to achieve) , gradually > > that trend will be > > stronger although conflicts might appear to delay those trends. > > > ======= > > S1000+ > > ======= > > > --- On Wed, 3/25/09, Xi Ling <xieu.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > From: Xi Ling <xieu.l...@gmail.com> > > Subject: For Sumerian (and anyone interested) on Malaysia, Australia and > > the global economy. Message 2/3 > > To: world-thread@googlegroups.com > > Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009, 10:35 AM > > > In this second message of the second thread, I will try to show the > > different region and economic blocs using some homemade pictures. They are > > accurate as far as drawing ellipses allowed me that is not too much. In > > addition, they do not show “islands” inside blocs and regions that probably > > will have different features that their surrounding areas. I mean that, for > > example, inside a region that has a main activity commodity production > > might dwell a fast growing area and vice versa. Red and gray do not mean > > wealthy and poor; they mean fast growth and lower growth or decline. This > > trend will last one or two centuries, therefore red areas will become > > wealthier than gray areas in the long term. However, I choose that picture > > because individual opportunities happen easier where growth is faster, not > > necessarily, where wealth is already present. > > > The reason because we can trust on this picture works lies on economic > > demography, and more in particular on works from prof. Paul Krugman, recent > > Nobel laureate in economics, for his definition on “hubs” or “monopolistic > > areas”. According to that works proximity and shorter distance create > > better conditions for related activities. > > > Therefore, we should expect that the area where 70% of the global > > population dwells, and will dwell, will become the most advanced area in > > social end economic terms. Both for production and consumption. That area > > is East, Southeast and South Asia. > > > Traditional developed areas will grow slower or even decline gradually > > along next few decades and centuries. > > > This is happening already. In addition, those economic blocs are more and > > more a fact. I think that does not require more words. For example, you > > probably can see easily that economic ties between Australia and China are > > harder and harder, gradually that trend will be stronger although conflicts > > might appear to delay those trends. > > > Peace and best wishes. > > Xi- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "World-thread" group. To post to this group, send email to world-thread@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to world-thread+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/world-thread?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
