Good evening,
no need to cc me as I'm registered on this mailing list.
Victor Stinner wrote:
What are the difference with our tarballs? It does include missing files and
your last "win32-upate.patch" patch?
Yes, everything that is required to (cross-)compile a windows binary and build
an installer.
2) If fixed a problem about po/Makefile (commit 795 and 797, fix two different
problems)
Yes I had to manually fill in the po/gmo/... @stuff@ for the SVN build.
3) wormux.ico and wormux.rc are now included in tarballs (commit 798)
TODO: include doc/license/* and tools/win32_setup/*
The license files are only used to display a localized license (which is
mandatory in some countries such as France to be enforceable) when the
installer is launched. One could do without it.
2) The FONT_DIR is set through Makefile based on $(datadir) (...)
I applied your patch on config.cpp (commit 799). Should be enough for Windows
binary.
Is a bit unsatisfactory, but as we saw, the other option is fighting our way
through the maketools behemoth.
I also applied you second patch, on create_setup.sh (commit 800)
It targets devel packages installed from this resource:
http://www.mapr.ucl.ac.be/~gustin/win32_ports/
There's still a problem with autotools script detecting NLS support.
Thanks for the fish :-)
Don't panic, I'm just reducing my amount of work on wormux, but I'm not
definetely leaving its development behind.
I think that we should start a communication campain about Windows over the
World Wide Web :-) I will try to do that with yekcim in our new
"communication team"!
Great. I've always wanted to be harassed by a Team17 lawyer.
Best regards,
Kurosu
_______________________________________________
Wormux-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wormux-dev
