You will have to forgive me for being somewhat disillusioned. I'm sure that if the same people that have commit access to the WordPress repository have commit access to the WordPress DocBook repository that there should be a pretty fast turnaround for patches. That would also mean that there would be around 5 to 7 people with commit access, which means more people who will be on the look out for committing patches.

The core team has been extremely good with committing documentation only patches (what? They don't break anything, so no testing). Whether there is a similar experience for this new repository is to be seen. I do hope that there is a quick commit turn-around for patches after a review. I shouldn't say it will be the experience given that it hasn't been released yet, so complaining is premature at this point. Well, there will be a wait period anyway, but I do hope that it isn't more than two weeks. If it is more than two weeks, then I will say that it is a bad experience for the new repository.

Me complaining (You don't have to read on):

I think my problem is more or less, I don't think I should need to tell people that I have a patch ready to be committed or reviewed ('commit' keyword should work for that). The process appears to be see ticket, write patch, submit complaint to wp-hackers or IRC to have them committed. God help you, if the core team or someone from Automattic disagrees with your patch or the ticket itself. So I always laugh, when like the commit team or it is mentioned that, patches are committed easily or tickets need patches (doesn't mean they'll be committed). No, historically, the process hasn't been as seamless as I think it should be. Although, to be fair, I usually work with low priority tickets, so that is a good reason for not caring. Not all of my patches were worth being committed and some of the tickets I wrote patches for weren't worth being part of WordPress.

That said, I haven't had one bad experience with having my patches committed, I've had two (and don't ask, I've all but blocked the experiences from my mind) and I don't count waiting a long time as an bad experience, waiting a long time is a "WTF?". I would say that except for a few code patches that were committed really fast (Yeah!), the only other patches I've submitted that had good experiences, were the inline documentation ones. I've often thought about transferring the tips I wrote on the funcdoc blog over to the codex to help those, who might give up after their first patch isn't committed in a timely fashion.

Jacob Santos

Charles K. Clarkson wrote:
Jacob Santos wrote:

I had to laugh, because I have like 6 or 7 patches for WordPress which haven't been committed yet and I'm still waiting. I also don't think you are being sarcastic, which I mean you know, it actually isn't too easy to have patches committed.

Are those documentation only patches or do they change the code? Do you find your Inline Document changes take an equally long time to be committed?


> If one or two people from Automattic or outside entity have commit
> access, then I'll tell you right now, that it won't be easy, based
> upon the patch process for the WordPress Tests Repository.

I would guess (because I really don't know) that part of the hold up for
WordPress Trac is the testing process. Even automated testing can
produce a lot of problems which need to be examined.

In a handbook SVN I would guess that rigorous testing would be mostly
eliminated. I think the approval process needed to commit changes would
be the bottleneck.


> If [those with commit access] don't think your documentation
> correction is worth it, then you'll have made the patch for nothing.

It seems that changes to the handbook would be approved by some small
group of people. We have to assume an appreciable amount of effort will
not make it into the handbook, but I am not convinced it would be for
nothing. That same rejected work might fit in on the Codex.

HTH,

Charles Clarkson

_______________________________________________
wp-docs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs

Reply via email to