add something on documents not mean the purposes is "self-promotion",
I think they are different.


On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Chip Bennett <[email protected]> wrote:

> If one is adding documentation to the Codex for purposes of self-promotion,
> one should probably reconsider those motives.
>
> The purpose of the Codex is to share information and documentation about
> WordPress, not to gain self-promotion.
>
> Chip
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:10 AM, ThemeDaily <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> "管理员" on this page http://cn.wordpress.org/contact/ means "administrator"
>> But I didn't find any similar on others like http://tw.
>> wordpress.org/about/
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:03 AM, ThemeDaily <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> *>Can you be specific what what offensive or issue is being had with the
>>> person?*
>>> There are *no guideline* mention the translator can't left personal
>>> information to self-promote and we also can find the same on other language
>>> page.
>>> As a respect to contributor  I think it should be talked before they
>>> remove anything like this--even their actions probably are right.
>>>
>>> *
>>> >Which makes it confusing as to why you think they are administrators.*
>>> Jiehanzheng left his/her personal imformation(personal email etc) on
>>> page: http://cn.wordpress.org/contact/ before so I thought he/she was an
>>> administrator, but it seems only his/her name is remained on this page now.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Lorelle on WordPress <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree that the conversation is a bit hard to follow. Can you be
>>>> specific what what offensive or issue is being had with the person? That
>>>> would really help us.
>>>>
>>>> The "supervisor" administrator list is here:
>>>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Special:ListUsers/sysop and I don't see
>>>> their name on that list. It is a locked down list and probably desperately
>>>> in need of updating, too. Which makes it confusing as to why you think they
>>>> are administrators.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone can contribute to the WordPress Codex, and is welcome to do so as
>>>> long as they do so within our guidelines.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for taking this on as we're having trouble with the direct
>>>> translation. It is much appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Lorelle
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:29 AM, mrmist <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In message <
>>>>> [email protected]>,
>>>>> ThemeDaily <[email protected]> writes
>>>>>
>>>>>  Hello, everyone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I noticed below users contribute nothing for Codex,but it seems they
>>>>>> think
>>>>>> themselves are the top administrators of Codex,
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm struggling to follow the thread of conversation to be honest, what
>>>>> with it being in a language I can only read through Google-translate, and 
>>>>> in
>>>>> a mixed-up order timewise.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, I can tell you that none of the mentioned people are codex
>>>>> admins.
>>>>>
>>>>> Further, to answer one of the points that was raised by someone at some
>>>>> point - a number of the codex admins do subscribe to this list.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> mrmist
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> wp-docs mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> wp-docs mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-docs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-docs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>
>
_______________________________________________
wp-docs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs

Reply via email to