I think this brings to light sort of a fair question. Should the Codex
consist only of officially supported functionality?

post_is_in_descendant_category() springs to mind. It's provided as an
example in the 
in_category()<http://codex.wordpress.org/Function_Reference/in_category#post_is_in_descendant_category_function>article.
Do we pull it out or leave it in as an alternative, unsupported
function?

Drew


On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 8:51 AM, John Blackbourn <[email protected]>wrote:

> On 11 November 2012 14:06, Manuel Schmalstieg <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > There are some functions for that, change_post_object_label() and
> > change_post_menu_label().
> >
> > Is there any reason why this information isn't in the Codex?
>
> Neither of these functions are present in WordPress. They are
> functions that people have written themselves and posted to the sites
> you linked to. There is no reason they would be on the Codex.
>
> John
> _______________________________________________
> wp-docs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>



-- 

"News is something someone wants suppressed. Everything else is just
advertising."
-- Lord Northcliff <http://www.timberlinegardens.com>
_______________________________________________
wp-docs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs

Reply via email to