Send wp-testers mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of wp-testers digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Page search (Sean Hayford O'Leary)
2. Re: TinyMCE Shows up Only Partially (Mog)
3. Re: TinyMCE Shows up Only Partially (Roy Schestowitz)
4. Re: MCE <p> </p> not seen when editing existing comments
(Andy Skelton)
5. Re: TinyMCE Shows up Only Partially (Andy Skelton)
6. Re: TinyMCE Shows up Only Partially (Andy Skelton)
7. Re: MCE <p> </p> not seen when editing existing comments
(Kishore Balakrishnan)
8. Re: MCE <p> </p> not seen when editing existing comments
(Andy Skelton)
This might verge on going back into the CMS area, but is there a
reason why pages are not indexed (without a hack or plugin)?
--
Sean Hayford O'Leary
I'm always online. Check out my personal site
[http://sdho.hayfordoleary.com], design site
[http://design.hayfordoleary.com] or HOP [http://p.hayfordoleary.com]
-- my portal project.
On Dec 5, 2005, at 10:34 PM, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
_____/ On Tue 06 Dec 2005 03:26:47 GMT, [Andy
Skelton] wrote : \_____
On 12/5/05, Roy Schestowitz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
in Linux. I have highlighted the top
panel to get the source, which I hope
can help debugging (see below).
Thank you for that. Your source looks perfect and I can access your
icons from my browser. Can you access them from your browser? Have you
tried clearing your cache?
I do not have any idea what's causing your issue, as everything in
TinyMCE/WordPress is creating the correct output and the icons are
accessible over the web. What other troubleshooting can you do?
Hi Andy,
I have just done some tests and disabled extensions/hacks.
Removing CSS-based AdBlock (see small attachment, URL posted in
previous
message) resolved the issue. It might be worth renaming the files or
at least
warn users about this collision. If a user was unaware of the
collision
and could not have the TinyMCE panel displayed, that would be a
deterrent.
Rather than warning, perhaps it is worth preventing?
Roy
Thanks, now I know why it didn't show up in Firefox as I had adblock
enabled. I was wondering if that was the cause. It worked perfectly in
Camino and what works in one usually works in the other.
Mog
_____/ On Tue 06 Dec 2005 06:09:43 GMT, [Mog] wrote : \_____
On Dec 5, 2005, at 10:34 PM, Roy Schestowitz
wrote:
_____/ On Tue 06 Dec 2005 03:26:47 GMT,
[Andy Skelton] wrote : \_____
On 12/5/05, Roy Schestowitz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
in Linux. I have highlighted the top
panel to get the source, which I hope
can help debugging (see below).
Thank you for that. Your source looks perfect and I can access your
icons from my browser. Can you access them from your browser? Have you
tried clearing your cache?
I do not have any idea what's causing your issue, as everything in
TinyMCE/WordPress is creating the correct output and the icons are
accessible over the web. What other troubleshooting can you do?
Hi Andy,
I have just done some tests and disabled extensions/hacks.
Removing CSS-based AdBlock (see small attachment, URL posted in
previous
message) resolved the issue. It might be worth renaming the files or
at least
warn users about this collision. If a user was unaware of the
collision
and could not have the TinyMCE panel displayed, that would be a
deterrent.
Rather than warning, perhaps it is worth preventing?
Roy
Thanks, now I know why it didn't show up in Firefox as I had adblock
enabled. I was wondering if that was the cause. It worked perfectly in
Camino and what works in one usually works in the other.
Mog
_____/ On Tue 06 Dec 2005 03:25:23 GMT, [Andy Skelton] wrote : \_____
On 12/5/05,
o°¤*(¯`°(#)(Ø(r)åñGêЪ¥s)(#)°´¯)*¤°o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i have the same problem as Roy
That's too bad. Can you contribute anything else toward the resolution
of this issue?
Andy
I guess that makes (at least) 3 of us...
I have lined up the source code against userContent.css in order to
identify an
easy fix.
* wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wphelp/images/help.gif
shows up because its path is different than most
* wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/advanced/images/code.gif
in the above, notice the word "advanced" which vaguely resembles
"advertisement". If you change the path to, let us say:
wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/pro/
The issue would be resolved altogether.
Roy
On 12/5/05, Kishore Balakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I edit an existing comment containing <p> , </p> - there are not
there when I go into edit mode (click on the 'e')
By design, the HTML edit mode is meant to show you what the post will
look like in the db. We strip paragraph tags unless they have
attributes.
You may present an argument and seek support for your case if you
would like to see this changed, but it's not a bug.
Andy
http://andy.wordpress.com
On 12/6/05, Roy Schestowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/advanced/images/code.gif
in the above, notice the word "advanced" which vaguely resembles
"advertisement". If you change the path to, let us say:
wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/pro/
The issue would be resolved altogether.
Maybe so, but this sounds very hypothetical.
I'm not excited about changing the directory structure to accommodate
an optional browser extension that is too liberal in its filtering of
page elements. Is that the default behavior of the extension? How hard
is it to fix the extension?
WP isn't broken in this situation, you have willfully broken your
browser. If you want to submit a patch for WP to accommodate you, log
into trac with your wp.org credentials and do so.
Andy
http://andy.wordpress.com
>From looking at Roy's CSS attachment, img[src*="/adv"] is probably the
selector that is causing your browser to ignore the icons.
There is a bug because the behaviour is different for posts vs pages...
Please reproduce as follows:
1) create a page with 2 lines abc def
-> the system automatically encloses the abc and def in <p>
and </p>
2) goto edit mode, the the paragraph effect is visible in the WYSIWYG
mode
3) create a comment similar to above
4) goto edit mode, the paragraph effect is not there in WYSIWYG mode
and also these attributes are missing in the HTML mode
--
On 12/6/05, Andy Skelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On
12/5/05, Kishore Balakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> When I edit an existing comment containing <p> ,
</p> - there are not
> there when I go into edit mode (click on the 'e')
By design, the HTML edit mode is meant to show you what the post will
look like in the db. We strip paragraph tags unless they have
attributes.
You may present an argument and seek support for your case if you
would like to see this changed, but it's not a bug.
Andy
http://andy.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
--
http://www.kishore.org/blog/
help with http://www.kishore.org/blog/2005/11/20/my-first-civil-action/
- am i doing something wrong to be threatened/intimidated with civil
action
On 12/6/05, Kishore Balakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is a bug because the behaviour is different for posts vs pages...
Please reproduce as follows:
1) create a page with 2 lines abc def
-> the system automatically encloses the abc and def in <p> and </p>
2) goto edit mode, the the paragraph effect is visible in the WYSIWYG mode
3) create a comment similar to above
4) goto edit mode, the paragraph effect is not there in WYSIWYG mode and
also these attributes are missing in the HTML mode
Ah! I misunderstood you earlier. Now this is beginning to look like a
bug report. Thank you. I'll look into it.
Andy
_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
