2005/12/6, Sean Hayford O'Leary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I do agree with you. I use it in a small seperated section of our website :)
I only mention it because WP is the best -- for me --
blogging system and if the authors lost their mind in that main focus
the program could lose a lot.WordPress has a good backend and prints clean code. It's simple, easy, and searchable. For small sites, I almost always recommend using it as a CMS.
I do agree with you. I use it in a small seperated section of our website :)
But I somewhat agree -- WordPress is still first and foremost a blogging system. But open source is meant to be built on after all.
Most of this discussion is about trying to make it have the same concerns that a full blown CMS as and that, in my opinion, is not what it should be.
At Care2x.org you have multi-language support, writers, translators, editors and so on. I think a CMS is only needed for those kind of not so dinamic websites.
For cummunities you have Mambo/Joomla and Drupal (for me the best PHP based ones) and their modules system to turn it what you want.
Those ideas are all based in trusting others: Blog (trust), CMS (less trust), Community (even less trust). But I may be wrong :)
Thanks.
Lopo
_______________________________________________ wp-testers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
