Hi
I am unable to put you tube code in wordpress.2.1 It doesnt show up when
seen in view mode..
What can be done?
Ashish
On 1/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Send wp-testers mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of wp-testers digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. re: 2.1 RC2 & Compat Plugins (S G)
2. RE: Here's one I hadn't seen before. (Brian Layman)
3. Is Akismet functioning well in 2.1? (Brian Layman)
4. Re: WP-login form actions (Matt)
5. Re: Is Akismet functioning well in 2.1? (Dov MD)
6. Blogroll dissappear after 2.1 Upgrade! (Dov MD)
7. Re: Blogroll dissappear after 2.1 Upgrade! (Aaron Brazell)
8. Re: Blogroll dissappear after 2.1 Upgrade! (Dov MD)
9. Re: WP-login form actions (Robin Adrianse)
10. Degrade procedure? (Dov MD)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:16:50 +0000 (GMT)
From: S G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [wp-testers] re: 2.1 RC2 & Compat Plugins
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hello,
my plugin readers_post also works with WP2.1
The URL is http://www.aufzynden.de/post-readers-wp-plugin/
Best regards
Stefan
... die besonderen Seiten des Motorradfahrens ...
http://www.aufzynden.de
___________________________________________________________
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:18:53 -0500
From: "Brian Layman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [wp-testers] Here's one I hadn't seen before.
To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Not worth the bulk of code needed to add backwards compat.
I would agree. I had to laugh at myself, because I thought the system had
done a one click spam deletion with no prompting. I thought "No, that
couldn't have gotten through..."
_______________________________________________
Brian Layman
http://www.TheCodeCave.com
http://www.TheCodeCave.com/EasyWPUpgrade
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:45:42 -0500
From: "Brian Layman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [wp-testers] Is Akismet functioning well in 2.1?
To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Is anyone else being slammed with spam today? I'm getting loads of them
and
I have at least 10 spams get through Akismet. I've had the occasional
spam
get through before, but never 10 in just half a day... I'm willing to
believe it is just one spammer using a method Akismet hasn't known, but
this
coincidence is awfully close to the 2.1 upgrade...
_______________________________________________
Brian Layman
http://www.TheCodeCave.com
http://www.TheCodeCave.com/EasyWPUpgrade
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:44:08 -0800
From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] WP-login form actions
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
This seems like a good idea. Also, if you had a SSL certificate installed
on
another domain (such as using a shared certificate that a lot of hosts
give
you access to) you'd be able to put wp-login.php on that other SSL domain.
On 1/22/07, Sean Hayford O'Leary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was thinking about this situation. Say you have your WP install at
> http://site.com but have SSL and wish to encrypt your password when
> you log in (for good reason). So you set the WordPress address to
> httpS://site.com and log in at httpS://site.com/wp-login.php.
>
> This works fine. BUT if you log in at http://site.com/wp-login.php
> (which is not exactly unlikely -- many users append "wp-login.php"
> when visiting their blog) it won't send the information to
> httpS://site.com/wp-login.php, it'll send it to
> http://site.com/wp-login.php. Sorry for the capital Ss, didn't want
> any confusion. Of course it's not just SSL -- any time you have that
> same file accessible from more than one address, problems arise.
>
> So, would there be any problem with using the wpurl setting when
> sending the form? Like on line 344, instead of:
>
> <form name="loginform" id="loginform" action="wp-login.php"
method="post">
>
> we had
>
> <form name="loginform" id="loginform" action="<?php
> bloginfo('wpurl'); ?>/wp-login.php" method="post">
>
> What do you guys think?
>
> --
> Sean Hayford O'Leary
> http://sdho.org
> _______________________________________________
> wp-testers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>
--
Matt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:49:00 -0400
From: "Dov MD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Is Akismet functioning well in 2.1?
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Sometimes comes more than the usual but it doesn't have any connection
with
any of the upgrades i have donde before... May it's a coincidence man!
At least everything if fine over here...
On 1/23/07, Brian Layman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is anyone else being slammed with spam today? I'm getting loads of them
> and
> I have at least 10 spams get through Akismet. I've had the occasional
> spam
> get through before, but never 10 in just half a day... I'm willing to
> believe it is just one spammer using a method Akismet hasn't known, but
> this
> coincidence is awfully close to the 2.1 upgrade...
> _______________________________________________
> Brian Layman
> http://www.TheCodeCave.com
> http://www.TheCodeCave.com/EasyWPUpgrade
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-testers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:51:13 -0400
From: "Dov MD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [wp-testers] Blogroll dissappear after 2.1 Upgrade!
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi!
Have someone over there any trouble with blogroll list after the
2.1upgrade? In one of my domains ths blogroll list has gone
completely!
I was thinking in the template, but i checked and everything looks to be
ok...
Any ideas?
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:53:27 -0500
From: Aaron Brazell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Blogroll dissappear after 2.1 Upgrade!
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Out of curiosity, is your template using wp_list_bookmarks()?
--
Aaron Brazell
Technology Architect, b5media
"A Global New Media Company"
web:: www.b5media.com, www.technosailor.com
phone:: 410-608-6620
skype:: technosailor
On Jan 23, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Dov MD wrote:
> Hi!
> Have someone over there any trouble with blogroll list after the
> 2.1upgrade? In one of my domains ths blogroll list has gone
> completely!
> I was thinking in the template, but i checked and everything looks
> to be
> ok...
> Any ideas?
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:00:41 -0400
From: "Dov MD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Blogroll dissappear after 2.1 Upgrade!
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
This the the part of the code refering to:
<?php wp_get_links(1); ?>
There is a <?php wp_get_links(2); ?> & <?php wp_get_links(3); ?> that are
working properly. I cannot figure what's going on here...
On 1/23/07, Aaron Brazell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, is your template using wp_list_bookmarks()?
> --
> Aaron Brazell
> Technology Architect, b5media
> "A Global New Media Company"
>
> web:: www.b5media.com, www.technosailor.com
> phone:: 410-608-6620
> skype:: technosailor
>
>
>
> On Jan 23, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Dov MD wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> > Have someone over there any trouble with blogroll list after the
> > 2.1upgrade? In one of my domains ths blogroll list has gone
> > completely!
> > I was thinking in the template, but i checked and everything looks
> > to be
> > ok...
> > Any ideas?
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-testers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:37:41 -0800
From: "Robin Adrianse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] WP-login form actions
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I think this is a good idea -- feel free to submit it to the Trac (
trac.wordpress.org).
On 1/22/07, Sean Hayford O'Leary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was thinking about this situation. Say you have your WP install at
> http://site.com but have SSL and wish to encrypt your password when
> you log in (for good reason). So you set the WordPress address to
> httpS://site.com and log in at httpS://site.com/wp-login.php.
>
> This works fine. BUT if you log in at http://site.com/wp-login.php
> (which is not exactly unlikely -- many users append "wp-login.php"
> when visiting their blog) it won't send the information to
> httpS://site.com/wp-login.php, it'll send it to
> http://site.com/wp-login.php. Sorry for the capital Ss, didn't want
> any confusion. Of course it's not just SSL -- any time you have that
> same file accessible from more than one address, problems arise.
>
> So, would there be any problem with using the wpurl setting when
> sending the form? Like on line 344, instead of:
>
> <form name="loginform" id="loginform" action="wp-login.php"
> method="post">
>
> we had
>
> <form name="loginform" id="loginform" action="<?php
> bloginfo('wpurl'); ?>/wp-login.php" method="post">
>
> What do you guys think?
>
> --
> Sean Hayford O'Leary
> http://sdho.org
> _______________________________________________
> wp-testers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:05:27 -0400
From: "Dov MD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [wp-testers] Degrade procedure?
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Can someone tell what would be the "degrade" procedure after a 2.1 upgrade
?
TY
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
End of wp-testers Digest, Vol 23, Issue 46
******************************************
--
Thanks and Regards
Ashish
Tech Blog : http://www.technospot.net/blogs/
Blogg-Buzz:http://www.blogg-buzz.com
_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
