On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:50:38 +1100, spencerp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DD32 wrote: >> The problem with saying that, Is that Firefox has lots of bugs too.. In some >> areas it supports less features than Safari or Opera, Or renders things >> completely different to the standards (Or just interprates the standards >> differently from all the other browsers/spec releasers meant). >> >> Its too early for sources of that, But its a realisitc comment, Firefox isnt >> Fully standards complient, Its much more so than Internet Eplorer for sure, >> And i'm notgoing to say Opera or Safari is more complient, Simply that they >> all have their own bugs(or different interpratations of) how things should >> appear. > > Oh yeah, I agree with what you and Gene are saying. I was just being > sarcastic, didn't intend it to become an argument or further discussion > about how Firefox isn't any better lol. I sorry, I need a spanking. > *Spanks self* (No not that way either, get mind out of gutter peoples. > LOL!) I thought it might be sarcastic, But with some FireFox fans... Weell... :) (Apologies to the sane firefox fans out there) _______________________________________________ wp-testers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
