--------------------------------------------------
From: "Matt Mullenweg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:52 AM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Re: WP caching / performance

deliciousdays wrote:
no one has done any performance testing on 2.5?

The performance bottleneck is usually the DB, and the format hasn't really changed since 2.3. That DB format runs tens of thousands of queries a second on WP.com, which is usually where we notice performance bottlenecks first.

what works and what doesn't in terms of caching (internal vs. 'external', ie plugin based methods)?

There has always been a built-in object cache that can ease things up on your DB, but for the best possible performance I would recommend any of the following plugins, including Super Cache written by MU hacker Donncha.

Are "Wordpress Viper Cache Alpha" or "WP Super Cache", perhaps the older "WP-Cache2" compatible/recommendable?

I believe another acceptable caching plugin that I've been using for awhile now including with 2.5 bleeding is Javier GarcĂ­a's "1 Blog Cacher". It's based on "WP-Cache" by Ricardo Galli and "HTML Cache" by Jiandong. It's simple to use and
works well with dynamic content.

Oh, BTW, I'm new here although I've posted a few times already. I should have
done this ages ago. Really enjoying myself.



As far as I know all are compatible with 2.5.

--
Matt Mullenweg
http://ma.tt | http://automattic.com
_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers

_______________________________________________
wp-testers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers

Reply via email to