I must say that I agree highly... Twitter is such a distraction, especially if you're following many ppl. *Oy*. What a pain.
-Paleo Pat http://www.politicalbyline.com On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Kim Parsell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I'm sorry, but Twitter, Facebook, etc. cannot replace blogs. Facebook is a > social community for staying in touch with family, friends, etc., and > Twitter just allows you to put whatever random thought rolls through your > mind out there for the whole world to see. Do I really need to know that > someone's dinner last night is causing them "issues" this AM? Both have more > "noise" than "signal". > > Bloggers take time to carefully craft an article on whatever subject they > are writing about. Can you imagine trying to do a political debate between > candidates where their answers have to be 140 characters or less? Or someone > writing a tutorial on something new in WP 2.7 - 140 characters or less eh? > Can't be done. > > There is a time/place for each thing - Twitter, Facebook, and blogs. > Whoever wrote that article is the one who is "out of touch". > > Just my 3 cents worth... > > Kim > > ------------------------------ > > Paleo Pat wrote: > >> Just an FYI: >> >> http://www.politicalbyline.com/2008/12/09/blogs-old-hat/ >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -Paleo Pat >> http://www.politicalbyline.com >> > _______________________________________________ > wp-testers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers > _______________________________________________ wp-testers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
