Yup, it's just a shame it's not as common as GD. Even on a shared server I manage to process hundreds of images quite quickly with IM. When I used to use GD it would crash quite a lot. I will admit that GD is a great library & IM is sometimes tricky to work with because of it being CLI (without IMagick installed), but there are just sometimes ImageMagick is the best choice IMHO.
Thanks for the answers though, guys. Maybe we'll see more about IM in 3.1. ;) Paul. On 26 March 2010 02:32, scribu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Paul Robinson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Ahh yeah. Sorry it's late here & I'm losing the ability to read, lol. >> >> I prefer imagemagick over GD because of the 5000x5000px limit on GD. Also >> being on a shared host IM can delegate memory usage to HD & cache space to >> get around low memory limits. So an override would be a much loved idea for >> me. I work with a lot of large images. >> > > I agree. > > Even though it's more common, GD library is inferior to ImageMagick in many > ways. > > > -- > http://scribu.net > _______________________________________________ > wp-testers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers > _______________________________________________ wp-testers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
