>Gordon Klimm schrieb: > > Hello there. > > > > Tomasz asked about the possibility that the new code for file->size > > could break if misused with directories. > > It took me a day and now I anounce: It is absolutely impossible to > > break the code attached to this mail. > so, does this mean I have to disregard your latest patch (modifications > to "checkCondition" - 0002.patch) and use what you attached here only > (0003.txt)? yes. If you look at the code, you will see why. The new code (0003.txt) is FAR more clean and understandable and it is very easy to modify. Furthermore it is Errochecked. > > a last word about "Microsoft.XMLDOM" vs "Msxml2.DOMDocument.3.0": > > I am back to use "Microsoft.XMLDOM". > > On my XP it made no change (yes, the errormessages for faulty xml did > > come up). I will check the behaviour with some other systems too but > > it might not be this week. > hmm, interesting. > so maybe we should revert to the older version (as the newer is only > supported with IE 6.0)? I have not checked older computers (yet) but as Microsoft said in its Knowledge Base: there will be no further support for non-version-XMLDOM starting from Longhorn. This Windows-version has not been released, so there is some time to find a propper solution :)
Best regards. Gordon Klimm -- 5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++ ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ wpkg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wpkg-users
