Falko Trojahn wrote: >>> I'm sorry, but this patch didn't work here - don't know why? >>> I applied it manually, made a new diff and re-send it for your >> >> It's because of: >> --- C:\Dokumente und... >> +++ C:\Dokumente und... >> >> on a non-windows machine (and patch utility couldn't find the right file) :) >> > Don't think so, since "patch" asked for the file to patch, I put in > "wpkg.js", and then "10 out of 10 hunks failed" ... > But the "diff U3b ..." options seems strange to me, this gives an error > here (diff: invalid context length `3b' > diff: Try `diff --help' for more information.) so, who knows ... Or it's > just the CRLF problem again.
Hmm, I just changed those two lines to match: --- wpkg.js Thu Jun 22 21:28:41 2006^ +++ wpkg.js Fri Jun 23 23:46:55 2006^ And it patched just fine: $ patch < 0.9.10.test2.patch patching file wpkg.js > Well, attached are two other patches - one for consolidation of > variables, one for some dinfo-instead-of-if-debug lines. Few more patches like that and we'll have all functionality in 10 only kB or so :) > One remark: perhaps it would be better to set the default of the > variable quitonerror to true in the distribution? I'd say it's better if it doesn't quit if there is a non-fatal error. From experience, I know some might wonder why WPKG stopped working one day... I think a similar behaviour is in Linux package management systems like rpm (and whatever sits on top of them, like urpmi or yum etc.). Or some arguments for making quitonerror default? :) -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ wpkg-users mailing list wpkg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wpkg-users
