http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77
--- Comment #8 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-10-29 11:02:59 --- Thanx for the detailed comments, Rainer. So I think that * I should look after changes between 0.9.10 and 0.9.12-test2 regarding bug#28; * not regarding wpkg-web, wpkg.js should be save enough on its own against errors in the package-definition files, as waking up monday morning without e.g. office on all clients is a horror scenario we don't need * I think it would be a good idea to have something like a bunch of xml and program files as a test case, so that each new version of wpkg.js can solve a test run. So we could proof that all logical/install/upgrade/remove/whatsoever variants and combinations of hosts/profiles/packages entries are fulfilled within a newer wpkg version. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ wpkg-users mailing list wpkg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wpkg-users
