Rainer Meier wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Mark Nienberg wrote: >> I was beginning to edit a package definition in "packages.xml" with the >> intention of >> gradually fixing and testing it. The package was already installed on a >> number of >> workstations, but I did not change the revision number, which was zero. I >> revised >> some of the install and upgrade commands and I changed the check condition. >> >> I was surprised to find that workstations were trying to install the package >> when >> they booted. As I said, the package was already installed on the >> workstations and >> there was no change in the revisions number. I'm guessing the workstations >> noticed >> the change in the check condition (which they did not meet) and decided an >> installation (not an upgrade) was needed. >> >> Expected behavior or a little bug? > > You could be right. The install function took the server side definition > to check if a package is installed. In your case you probably got a log > entry like > "Installed but checks failed. Re-Installing."
There was never a log entry for whether the package was installed or not. The first mention of the package is "Installing dependencies for...", following by "Installing", etc. Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reporting bugs, all WPKG mailing lists >> http://wpkg.org/Support _______________________________________________ wpkg-users mailing list wpkg-users@lists.wpkg.org http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users
