Falko Trojahn <nospam...@smi-softmark.de> writes: > Hello Daniel,
Hello, > please test wpkg.js with your patch applied using "wpkg-test" from > > http://wpkg.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wpkg/wpkg/wpkg-test/ > rf. > |svn co http://wpkg.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wpkg wpkg/wpkg-test| > > If the tests run well, it would be nice if you write an additional test > set with all possible ways of using your new features to make sure your > patch does the new things right. > > > The explanations in README.txt are way too short - had no time yet to > explain wpkg-test in the wiki. So, please, if you have questions e.g. > about how to create the test sets feel free to drop me a mail. With a mainline 1.1.3-RC2 the following tests failed: - test 3: 23, 24, 25, 26, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 - test 1: 10, 12 Same results with my patched[1] wpkg.js, looks like I don't break anything ;-). I'll look more closely at wpkg-test, looking at reliable full tests like: - Does it compile ? (cscript wpkg.js --help with no error) - Test each command line (maybe looking at debug output to see if options are changed with command line switches) - Extending tests set with my uses cases wpkg-test seems to focus on working tests, I think we should add tests that are OK if they fail (error handling). I confess that doing this in DOS batch is quite repulsive to me[2]. Regards. Footnotes: [1] I tested the extended-hosts and factorise series. [2] I like perl Test::Harness[3] ;-) [3] http://search.cpan.org/~andya/Test-Harness-3.21/lib/Test/Harness.pm -- Daniel Dehennin RAIP de l'Orne
pgpK8oU9IBbJ7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- wpkg-users mailing list archives >> http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/ _______________________________________________ wpkg-users mailing list wpkg-users@lists.wpkg.org http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users
