In message <4edd1224.3060...@freakyacres.com>
Joe <j...@freakyacres.com> wrote:
> On 12/5/2011 1:03 PM, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.wpkg.org wrote:
>> http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=258
>>
>> Rainer Meier<r.me...@wpkg.org> changed:
>>
>> What |Removed |Added
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
>>
>> --- Comment #3 from Rainer Meier<r.me...@wpkg.org> ---
>> Oh, I did not even think about this. But sure this is a good
>> explanation too :)
>>
>> Closing this issue.
>>
> Is that the proper behavior? Should a 64bit machine be detected as 32bit
> because of the client software?
I imagine it is. I would not expect to be able to run a 64-bit
application on a 32-bit OS, which is what would happen if the hardware
determined the architecture type.
Alan
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> wpkg-users mailing list archives >>
> http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/
> _______________________________________________
> wpkg-users mailing list
> wpkg-users@lists.wpkg.org
> http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users
--
Alan Adams, from Northamptonshire
a...@adamshome.org.uk
http://www.nckc.org.uk/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
wpkg-users mailing list archives >> http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/
_______________________________________________
wpkg-users mailing list
wpkg-users@lists.wpkg.org
http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users
