Thanks Semian, I will make a note of that. Paul -----Original Message----- From: wpkg-users-boun...@lists.wpkg.org [mailto:wpkg-users-boun...@lists.wpkg.org] On Behalf Of Semián Matej Sent: 15 May 2012 14:42 To: wpkg-users@lists.wpkg.org Subject: Re: [wpkg-users] value have underscores?
Hello. It does not work for version checks.. So be avare of this in your scripts. Log: File version check for file 'H:\WINDOWS\System32\Macromed\Flash\Flash32_11_2_202_235.ocx' returned false for operation type versiongreaterorequal. Checking file version 11.2.202.235 is versiongreaterorequal (than) 11_2_202_235 - got result -1. Dne 15.5.2012 12:24, Paul McGrath napsal(a): > Thanks Rainer, > Whilst I was waiting a reply I had a test myself and it worked. I didn't > go as deep as you and 'debug'. > I asked because the latest Adobe Flash ocx and dll files are now named > including the version as underscores. So a file exists check is easier than > before. > BW > Paul > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rainer Meier [mailto:r.me...@wpkg.org] > Sent: 15 May 2012 11:10 > To: Paul McGrath > Cc: wpkg-users@lists.wpkg.org > Subject: Re: [wpkg-users] value have underscores? > > Hi Paul, > > On 15.05.2012 10:40, Paul McGrath wrote: >> So far I have just used '.' (dots, full stops, periods!) to denote >> version variables. Is it possible to use '_' (underscores) e.g. >> >> <variable name="version" value="11_1_102_55"/> >> >> If the version is incremented then will upgrade work based on a value >> containing '_'? > > I've done a quick test and in this case it works. Quickly tested your version > number and then upgraded to 11_1_102_56: > > > 2012-05-15 12:03:07, DEBUG : Comparing version: '11_1_102_56'<=> > '11_1_102_55'. > 2012-05-15 12:03:07, DEBUG : Comparing version fragments: '11'<=> '11' > 2012-05-15 12:03:07, DEBUG : Comparing version fragments: '1'<=> '1' > 2012-05-15 12:03:07, DEBUG : Comparing version fragments: '102'<=> '102' > 2012-05-15 12:03:07, DEBUG : Comparing version fragments: '56'<=> '55' > 2012-05-15 12:03:07, INFO : Package 'Testing package' (test): Already > installed but version mismatch.|Installed revision: > '11_1_102_55'|Available > revision: '11_1_102_56'.|Preparing upgrade. > > > Although I still recommend to use standard "dotted" notation as the > above one works only because WPKG splits each part of the version > number by non-numeric characters. So therefore 11_1_102_55 is not > interpreted as "11.1.102.55" but as the expression 11_1_102_55 which > is split into distinct numbers and then compared piece by piece. > > But as said, in your case it works perfectly as long as you just use > digits split by non-digit characters. Seamlessly 11v1v102v55 would work too. > > br, > Rainer > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- wpkg-users mailing list archives>> > http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/ > _______________________________________________ > wpkg-users mailing list > wpkg-users@lists.wpkg.org > http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users -- S pozdravem Matěj Semián Stavební bytové družstvo POKROK Kollárova 157/18, Praha 8 tel. 225 339 402 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- wpkg-users mailing list archives >> http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/ _______________________________________________ wpkg-users mailing list wpkg-users@lists.wpkg.org http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------- wpkg-users mailing list archives >> http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/ _______________________________________________ wpkg-users mailing list wpkg-users@lists.wpkg.org http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users
