El mar, 11-09-2012 a las 12:28 +1000, Patrick CAHILL escribió: > Carlos, > yes but you have to remember that the Check has what is currently > installed on the Client on the Left of the GreaterThanorEqual and > whats packaged on the Server on the Right. > > > If [Currently_Installed_on_Client] Is [GreaterThanOrEqual] > To [Package_on_Server] Then [Upgrade] > If [3.5.1] is GreaterThanOrEqual To [3.6.1] Then [Upgrade] > So 3.5.1 has to be Larger or Equal to 3.6.1 for the Upgrade to occur, > this will never happen, 3.5 is never bigger than 3.6 (which you will > note is why the check system never checks the final .1 in your log, it > stops after .5 >= .6) > > > As far as I can tell, GreaterThanOrEqual should be used to "Upgrade" > to a lower version, a Downgrade if you will. > > > Imagine if you have 3.6.1 installed but it has some bad problem on > your systems, you could create a package with the check... > If [3.6.1] is GreaterThanOrEqual To [3.5.1] Then [Upgrade] > This will Upgrade to the lower version. > > > Typically you want to upgrade to a higher version, so you should use > LessThan or LessThanOrEqual > If [Currently_Installed_on_Client] Is [LessThan] [Package_on_Server] > Then [Upgrade] > If [3.5.1] is LessThan [3.6.1] Then [Upgrade] > > > I hope this helps (and that it is correct) ;) > > > -Pat Cahill > > > On 11/09/12, "Carlos R. Pasqualini" <pasquali...@fcal.uner.edu.ar> > wrote: > > El mar, 11-09-2012 a las 09:32 +1000, Patrick CAHILL escribió: > > > Carlos, > > > can you try something for me? > > > In your LibreOffice Upgrade definition, replace > > > 'versiongreaterorequal' with 'versionsmallerthan' > > > > > > > > > The way I read the documentation is... > > > > > > > > > IF [the_version_installed] IS [condition] [the_version_packaged] > > > THEN install/upgrade > > > > > > > > > So your error is actually logically correct. > > > If [3.5] is [Greater Than or Equal To] [3.6] then Upgrade > > > > > > > > > Your return code is -1 which in a tri-state (less, equal, greater) > > > like this is usually lessthan, which is correct. > > > (A less than B = -1, A equal B = 0, A greater than B = 1) > > > > > > > > > The reason I say use ''versionsmallerthan' rather than > > > 'versionlessorequal' is that I think you only want to upgrade if > > the > > > version installed is smaller, if its the same as is in the package > > > then you dont want to install again. > > > > > > > > > Even if I am wrong, its only a quick one word change. > > > > > > > I will give it a try tomorrow, but that doesn't have any sense; we > > are > > talking about the 'check' condition, it is supposed to check if the > > package is already installed/upgraded and not if WPKG needs to do > > some > > work... > > > > See http://wpkg.org/Packages.xml#Check_conditions_.2F_check_type > > says: > > > > --- > > Of course it would be unwise to launch the installer if the software > > is > > already installed. That's why there are "check conditions". > > The check conditions are also used after the installer has finished > > to > > verify that the software has actually been successfully installed. > > --- > > > > so i'm making the check condition against the new version of the > > package, not the older one; i want to have installed in this system > > this > > version or any greater version (if it was installed manually) > > > > > > > > Best Regards
Dear Pat i really thank you for taking time to answer other user's questions, but i think you are really wrong. I will insist, the check is to see if the installed version complies with the package's requirements. As I understand the <check /> does not have any inference in the decision of upgrading or downgrading a package. I would like to have some other users to give her thoughts on this. Best Regards ------------------------------------------------------------------------- wpkg-users mailing list archives >> http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/ _______________________________________________ wpkg-users mailing list wpkg-users@lists.wpkg.org http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkg-users
