This was part of what I was alluding to earlier, the value of this work being applied to protocols/applications like the ones described below (for my own selfish interests, I was thinking about SIP and XMPP :)
Randy On Aug 22, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 8/22/12 4:29 PM, Hill, Brad wrote: > >> I think “the Web” / HTTPS is the only PKI (other than the work >> PKIX does/did) with enough actually interoperating >> implementations... > > Brad, do you include the use of PKIX certificates in application > technologies like IMAP, LDAP, NETCONF, SIP, SMTP, SNMP, Syslog, and > XMPP as part of or derivative from "the Web PKI"? The proposed charter > seems tightly focused on browsers and HTTPS, but (as documented in RFC > 6125) there's plenty of implementation and deployment of PKIX > certificates outside that space. > > Peter > > - -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlA1gbQACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyTrACg0UuaY0WHCWqXn6ZfnIapFG2K > h6UAoPldt4Pp01duTrgJv9h/c+xsEFZv > =iDW8 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > wpkops mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops _______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
