OK so working on the draft and trying to get a handle on how to sort out all these degrees of freedom.
While I was doing so discovered that RFC 5280 doesn't really specify a certificate lifecycle as such, it describes a mechanism for reporting CRLs which is not quite the same thing. The other thing I was somewhat surprised to find is that the cACompromise reason code is defined but at no point in the document does the string cACompromise occur in the context of defining when it should be used. Same for the other reason codes. -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
