From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, June 6, 2013 12:22 PM To: Rob Stradling <[email protected]> Cc: Erwann ABALEA <[email protected]>, Carl Wallace <[email protected]>, Adam Langley <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [wpkops] Some questions about revocation reasons
> <snip> > What is an RP to assume from an indirect CRL? > Is this relevant to the tasks this working group is currently working on? I thought the task being discussed here was the (possibly) easier task of identifying what is actually used in the web PKI w.r.t. revocation status determination. I suggested a taxonomy be used to identify what is actually used to give some structure to the discussion and to potentially serve as a precursor to deprecating options no one uses so client code could lose some needless complexity. <snip>
_______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
