That is a good idea. I dislike using RP as it comes with baggage. There is an advantage to having some distance when considering operations.
Web Browser would address that. On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Rob Stradling <[email protected]>wrote: > On 07/06/13 21:20, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > >> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-**hallambaker-pkixstatus-00.txt<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hallambaker-pkixstatus-00.txt> >> This is a very very drafty draft. At this stage I am still trying to >> describe the ground we want to measure. But I did say I would post what >> I had today. >> Need to decide on terminology across all the drafts. Are we talking >> about clients or Relying parties etc. Needs to be the same. Probably >> should be RPs but have not changed mine yet. >> > > Clients and Relying Parties are terms used outside of the Web PKI. > > Wouldn't it be better to pick a term that only refers to all Clients of > the Web PKI? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Web_browser<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_browser> > "A web browser (commonly referred to as a browser) is a software > application for retrieving, presenting and traversing information resources > on the World Wide Web." > > Also have to go back to the minutes to see if I left any dimensions of >> the revocation world out. >> >> -- >> Website: http://hallambaker.com/ >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> wpkops mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/wpkops<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops> >> >> > -- > Rob Stradling > Senior Research & Development Scientist > COMODO - Creating Trust Online > -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
