Please re-read the charter. The scope of the WG is narrower than you
seem to wish.
If this is going to be a persistent problem, then maybe you ought not be
a co-author for
this document.
Steve
------
On 6/27/13 8:27 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi
Then we´re assuming that web PKI means only TLS connections, am I
right? So "web" is used only in "browsers"? I think this is not fair.
We are talking about trust models and browsers root stores is only
"one" of these models, not the only one and we should consider the
others.
I don´t get why we are assuming that web PKI is only referred to the
browsers, and if so, the document could be very simple, just pointing
to the browsers policies or leave it to the CAB Forum, which is not a
standards body like it can be IETF.
If we´re to produce a standard on trust models we should consider all
options, not just one because it´s the most used. That is not an standard.
Regards
Hiya,
_______________________________________________
wpkops mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
