Hi Rick On 02/12/2013 23:58, Rick Andrews wrote: >> Hi Rick >> >> this is getting good now. However I think q6 is too complex >> >> 6) Does the product allow for the configuration of multiple >> certificates using different public key algorithms (RSA, DSA, ECC) >> but the same Subject DN, >> >> could be answered yes or no >> >> and deliver the most appropriate certificate to each client based >> on the client's capabilities as indicated in the ClientHello >> message? could also be answered yes or no >> >> So what if a user has yes for the first half and no for the second >> half, or vice versa? >> >> Maybe best to split into two questions. Same goes for q7. > > David, I worded it this way because this is exactly what Apache > supports and IE does not. If I broke it up into two questions, and > someone answered yes for the first one, and no for the second one, > they'd need to explain why they allow multiple certs with the same DN > in the first place. > > I think that we need to encourage every survey responder to feel free > to elaborate on any answer, even if it's a simple yes/no question. > Would that help?
Yes, if you have a space at the end of each question where respondents can add clarifying remarks that would be OK > >> Other minor comments below: >> >> Q8, Q14, and Q17a) and Q20b) and Q22a) add (tick all that apply) > > OK, but do you mind if I say "check" instead of "tick"? ;^) I think > that's a Britishism. Gosh, I thought we invented the English language, and corruptions to it were Americanisms :-) What do you call pieces of paper on which you transfer money from your bank account to someone else? regards David > >> Q9 d. other add Please specify. > > Done > >> Q17b. What answer are you looking for? If its the numbers 1 to 9 in >> the order of support, then state this (in brackets). > > Done > >> Q20 c. and d. are a bit vague. What answers are you looking for? > > Adam Langley from Google has indicated that not all CRLs are included > in Chrome's CRL Set. I was looking for clarity on which ones a CA > and/or relying party can expect to be included or not included. > > -Rick > _______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
